{"api":{"name":"api.sb","description":"Business-as-Code surface for Startups.Studio","home":"https://api.sb","docs":"https://api.sb/docs","version":"1.0.0"},"$context":"https://api.sb/$context","$type":"FoundingHypothesis","$id":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Amechanical-engineers-change-order-impact-assessment%3At-td%3Av1","links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Amechanical-engineers-change-order-impact-assessment%3At-td%3Av1","canonical":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Amechanical-engineers-change-order-impact-assessment%3At-td%3Av1","pool":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses"},"foundingHypothesis":{"id":"fh:mechanical-engineers-change-order-impact-assessment:t-td:v1","lens":"ManagedWorkflow","type":"founding-hypothesis","click":{"rubricScores":{"C8_lensFit":1,"C7_magicLensFit":1,"C4_competitorHonesty":1,"C6_crossSlotCoherence":1,"C1_customerSpecificity":1,"C2_problemFrictionRealism":1,"C9_killCriteriaAttestability":1,"C3_approachEngineCoverability":1,"C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape":1},"upperRightLoserville":true},"cellRef":{"id":"work-contexts.org.ai/mechanical-engineers-change-order-impact-assessment","stableHash":"wcc:mechanical-engineers:change-order-impact-assessment:document:v1"},"problem":{"slotStatement":"After a planner issues an ECO against a 69kV substation breaker swap, the mechanical engineer cannot get sign-off because nobody will commit in writing to whether the change crosses the threshold that triggers a new protection study, a PUC filing, or a re-coordination with the G&T — so the package sits in a shared inbox for 9-14 days while liability for the unstudied change quietly drifts back to whichever engineer opens the email last."},"approach":{"oneSentence":"Route every ECO through an authority-boundary classifier that, before the package leaves engineering, investigates the change against the co-op's delegation-of-authority matrix, protection-coordination model, and RUS/PUC filing thresholds, then dispatches it to the exact named approver with a signed, verifiable impact record stapled to the work order."},"customer":{"icpShape":"VP of Engineering or Director of Operations Planning at a member-owned electric cooperative (CompanyType/company-type-member-owned-electric-cooperative) serving 50k-300k meters, where the buyer is the VP Engineering (signs the tooling PO and owns the PUC/FERC audit posture) and the daily user is the staff mechanical/substation engineer routing ECOs through the PSS/E model, GIS, and the co-op's work-order system.","beachheadShape":"EarlyMajorityWorkflow: Generation & Transmission-affiliated distribution co-ops in the 100k-250k meter band running 30-80 ECOs/month against substation and feeder assets, where an RUS-financed capital plan makes approval-stall a board-visible cost-recovery risk."},"archetype":"startup-archetypes.org.ai/ManagedWorkflow-MarketplaceClearing","beachhead":"EarlyMajorityWorkflow: Generation & Transmission-affiliated distribution co-ops in the 100k-250k meter band running 30-80 ECOs/month against substation and feeder assets, where an RUS-financed capital plan makes approval-stall a board-visible cost-recovery risk.","competitors":{"substitutes":[{"name":"Manual Outlook + SharePoint + Milsoft WindMil routing","category":"manual-bridge"},{"name":"Futura Systems (GIS-based work management used by co-ops)","category":"incumbent","uncopyabilityReason":"Futura's revenue model is GIS-of-record seat licensing tied to NRECA/RUS staking sheet workflows; bolting on an authority-boundary classifier that binds to the co-op's delegation matrix and protection studies would require integration depth into PSS/E and the co-op's board-approved DOA document that Futura has never owned — their data model stops at the geospatial asset, not the approval-authority graph."},{"name":"NISC iVUE / Cooperative Work Management","category":"incumbent","uncopyabilityReason":"NISC is a member-owned cooperative software provider whose deployment is a shared-tenant accounting/CIS/work-management suite governed by a member board; shipping a per-co-op-tuned ECO approval engine collides with their deployment-mode-mismatch — they cannot customize the authority-boundary logic per member without breaking the shared-release cadence that 800+ co-ops depend on."},{"name":"Copperleaf C55 Asset Investment Planning","category":"incumbent","uncopyabilityReason":"Copperleaf sells capital-intensity-heavy, multi-quarter implementations to IOUs and large G&Ts; their unit economics require $400k+ ACVs and 9-month deployments, so they structurally cannot serve a 120k-meter distribution co-op's ECO-level approval loop without cannibalizing the enterprise APM motion that funds the company."},{"name":"Siemens PSS/E + manual engineer's memo","category":"adjacent vertical","uncopyabilityReason":"PSS/E is a power-flow and dynamics simulator licensed per-engineer-seat; Siemens' liability posture as a study-tool vendor explicitly disclaims approval authority, so embedding a binding ECO-sign-off workflow would force Siemens to take on engineering-of-record liability its license agreements are built to refuse."}]},"studioThesis":"T-TD","killThreshold":{"K":8,"M":70,"N":7,"rubricItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C7_magicLensFit","C8_lensFit","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicy":"all-load-bearing-pass-and-overall-ge-X","loadBearingItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicyVerbatim":"KILL unless every load-bearing rubric item passes per workbook AND overall pass-rate ≥ 7/9 (CASCADE.md §4 Stage 9 commit threshold)."},"lifecycleState":"Active","differentiation":{"twoByTwo":{"xAxis":"Authority boundary handling (engineer must manually decide who signs ↔ system resolves the named approver from the co-op's DOA matrix + PUC threshold rules)","yAxis":"Integration depth with the protection/coordination model (opinion-only memo ↔ reads live PSS/E + GIS + DOA to produce a binding impact record)","winningQuadrant":"System auto-resolves the named approver against the co-op's DOA and PUC thresholds AND reads the live protection model to produce a signed impact record that closes the approval loop in <48h","loservilleEscape":true,"loservilleQuadrant":"Engineer hand-writes a memo guessing who needs to sign while cross-checking PSS/E outputs by eye — the NISC iVUE + Outlook status quo that leaves ECOs parked 9-14 days with unassigned liability"}},"unmetRequirements":[],"pricingArchitecture":"tiered"},"actions":{},"options":{},"relationships":{"runtimeUnit":"https://api.sb/v1/runtime-units?startupRef=startup%3Afh%3Amechanical-engineers-change-order-impact-assessment%3At-td%3Av1","brand":"https://api.sb/v1/brands?startupId=startup%3Afh%3Amechanical-engineers-change-order-impact-assessment%3At-td%3Av1","listing":"https://api.services/listings?foundingHypothesisRef=fh%3Amechanical-engineers-change-order-impact-assessment%3At-td%3Av1","cell":"https://api.sb/v1/cells/work-contexts.org.ai/mechanical-engineers-change-order-impact-assessment","thesis":"https://api.sb/v1/theses/T-TD"},"meta":{"level":"L0","scopes":[]},"user":{"requestId":"a057bbd46e772308","edgeLocation":"a057bbd46e772308","geo":{"country":"US"},"ua":{"browser":"Claude"}},"references":{"total":0,"limit":25,"page":1,"links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Amechanical-engineers-change-order-impact-assessment%3At-td%3Av1/references"},"items":[]}}