{"api":{"name":"api.sb","description":"Business-as-Code surface for Startups.Studio","home":"https://api.sb","docs":"https://api.sb/docs","version":"1.0.0"},"$context":"https://api.sb/$context","$type":"FoundingHypothesis","$id":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aprivate-detectives-and-investigators-background-investigation-report%3At-low%3Av1","links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aprivate-detectives-and-investigators-background-investigation-report%3At-low%3Av1","canonical":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aprivate-detectives-and-investigators-background-investigation-report%3At-low%3Av1","pool":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses"},"foundingHypothesis":{"id":"fh:private-detectives-and-investigators-background-investigation-report:t-low:v1","lens":"ManagedWorkflow","type":"founding-hypothesis","click":{"rubricScores":{"C8_lensFit":1,"C7_magicLensFit":1,"C4_competitorHonesty":1,"C6_crossSlotCoherence":1,"C1_customerSpecificity":1,"C2_problemFrictionRealism":1,"C9_killCriteriaAttestability":1,"C3_approachEngineCoverability":1,"C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape":1},"upperRightLoserville":true},"cellRef":{"id":"work-contexts.org.ai/private-detectives-and-investigators-background-investigation-report","stableHash":"wcc:private-detectives-and-investigators:background-investigation-report:document:v1"},"problem":{"slotStatement":"The licensed PI ends up personally re-doing 60-80% of a junior researcher's draft background report because the junior pulled a same-name match from a county criminal index, missed a sealed-record flag, or cited a data-broker aggregate the court won't accept — so the licensee burns three billable hours per report re-running PACER, the state DOC site, and the county clerk to cure the defects before signing off under their license number."},"approach":{"oneSentence":"A subject-dossier workflow that routes every claim in the draft background report (identity resolution, criminal history, civil filings, employment/education verification) through a licensee-defined rubric — each finding is pinned to the originating court docket, registrar record, or employer callback transcript and flagged GO/NO-GO/NEEDS-LICENSEE-REVIEW, producing a review-ready dossier the Principal can sign in 20 minutes instead of rebuilding from scratch."},"customer":{"icpShape":"Owner-operator or Managing Investigator at a bootstrap private-investigation agency (CompanyType/company-type-bootstrap-agency, 2-10 licensed investigators, typical book of pre-employment, tenant, and litigation-support background checks for small-law and HR clients) where the buyer is the Agency Principal / Licensed PI who signs the client engagement and carries the state PI license, and the daily user is a Junior Investigator or Research Assistant compiling the subject background report.","beachheadShape":"EarlyAdopterJTBD: solo-to-10-seat state-licensed PI shops in CA/TX/FL/NY that sell fixed-fee background reports to plaintiff's attorneys and mid-sized HR teams, and need to absorb 2-3x report volume without hiring a second licensee."},"archetype":"startup-archetypes.org.ai/ManagedWorkflow-MarketplaceClearing","beachhead":"EarlyAdopterJTBD: solo-to-10-seat state-licensed PI shops in CA/TX/FL/NY that sell fixed-fee background reports to plaintiff's attorneys and mid-sized HR teams, and need to absorb 2-3x report volume without hiring a second licensee.","competitors":{"substitutes":[{"name":"Junior investigator compiling in Word + TLO/IRB search + county clerk portals","category":"manual-bridge","uncopyabilityReason":""},{"name":"TLOxp (TransUnion)","category":"incumbent","uncopyabilityReason":"TLOxp is a regulated GLBA/DPPA-permissible-purpose data aggregator — its whole P&L depends on selling raw skip-trace and record-retrieval queries, not on adjudicating whether a given hit belongs to the subject or will survive FCRA dispute. Rebuilding its product into a licensee-reviewable dossier engine would require it to take on report-level liability it has spent 20 years structurally disclaiming in its subscriber agreements (liability-posture barrier)."},{"name":"IRBsearch / Tracers","category":"incumbent","uncopyabilityReason":"IRBsearch is distributed exclusively through state PI and collections-association channels as a per-query search tool priced on data credits; its go-to-market is the individual licensee buying search packs, not a workflow subscription tied to report output. Shipping a rubric-graded dossier compiler in 6 months would require rebuilding the vetting/credentialing and per-query billing plumbing that gates every customer (distribution-channel barrier)."},{"name":"Checkr","category":"AI-native horizontal","uncopyabilityReason":"Checkr is deployed as an API-first consumer-reporting agency serving gig-economy and enterprise HR at scale; its adjudication engine is tuned to FCRA pre-employment use cases with consented applicants and ATS integrations. Small-shop PI work (litigation support, attorney-directed asset/background, tenant screening under different state rules) sits outside its ATS-plugged deployment mode, and retrofitting a licensee-in-the-loop review surface contradicts its fully-automated scale economics (deployment-mode-mismatch barrier)."},{"name":"Thomson Reuters CLEAR","category":"incumbent","uncopyabilityReason":"CLEAR's moat is depth of integrated court, DMV, and utility data under enterprise-grade permissible-purpose contracts sold to AmLaw firms, federal agencies, and Fortune 500 investigations teams; its sales cycle and minimum seat commitments exclude the 2-10 seat bootstrap PI shop. Rebuilding a self-serve, report-graded workflow for that SMB segment would cannibalize neither its data nor its enterprise channel, but would demand an integration-depth rewrite from query-result panels to structured report artifacts (integration-depth barrier)."}]},"studioThesis":"T-LOW","killThreshold":{"K":11,"M":60,"N":7,"rubricItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C7_magicLensFit","C8_lensFit","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicy":"all-load-bearing-pass-and-overall-ge-X","loadBearingItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicyVerbatim":"KILL unless every load-bearing rubric item passes per workbook AND overall pass-rate ≥ 7/9 (CASCADE.md §4 Stage 9 commit threshold)."},"lifecycleState":"Active","differentiation":{"twoByTwo":{"xAxis":"Identity-resolution rigor (same-name bucket dump ↔ licensee-defined match rubric with disambiguation trail)","yAxis":"Authority boundary (search-tool output, licensee assembles report ↔ workflow produces licensee-signable dossier scoped to state PI statute)","winningQuadrant":"Licensee-defined match rubric that emits a state-PI-signable dossier — each finding carries a docket/record-level disambiguation trail the Principal reviews in minutes, not a raw hit list the junior must hand-assemble","loservilleEscape":true,"loservilleQuadrant":"Raw same-name hit dumps from search-tool UIs (the TLOxp / IRBsearch failure mode) that leave the licensee personally re-running PACER and county clerks to cure mis-attributed criminal hits before signing the report"}},"unmetRequirements":[],"pricingArchitecture":"tiered"},"actions":{},"options":{},"relationships":{"runtimeUnit":"https://api.sb/v1/runtime-units?startupRef=startup%3Afh%3Aprivate-detectives-and-investigators-background-investigation-report%3At-low%3Av1","brand":"https://api.sb/v1/brands?startupId=startup%3Afh%3Aprivate-detectives-and-investigators-background-investigation-report%3At-low%3Av1","listing":"https://api.services/listings?foundingHypothesisRef=fh%3Aprivate-detectives-and-investigators-background-investigation-report%3At-low%3Av1","cell":"https://api.sb/v1/cells/work-contexts.org.ai/private-detectives-and-investigators-background-investigation-report","thesis":"https://api.sb/v1/theses/T-LOW"},"meta":{"level":"L0","scopes":[]},"user":{"requestId":"a0575b15ef11284b","edgeLocation":"a0575b15ef11284b","geo":{"country":"US"},"ua":{"browser":"Claude"}},"references":{"total":0,"limit":25,"page":1,"links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aprivate-detectives-and-investigators-background-investigation-report%3At-low%3Av1/references"},"items":[]}}