{"api":{"name":"api.sb","description":"Business-as-Code surface for Startups.Studio","home":"https://api.sb","docs":"https://api.sb/docs","version":"1.0.0"},"$context":"https://api.sb/$context","$type":"FoundingHypothesis","$id":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Areal-estate-sales-agents-property-disclosure-review%3At-bu%3Av1","links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Areal-estate-sales-agents-property-disclosure-review%3At-bu%3Av1","canonical":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Areal-estate-sales-agents-property-disclosure-review%3At-bu%3Av1","pool":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses"},"foundingHypothesis":{"id":"fh:real-estate-sales-agents-property-disclosure-review:t-bu:v1","lens":"HeadlessSaaS","type":"founding-hypothesis","click":{"rubricScores":{"C8_lensFit":0,"C7_magicLensFit":1,"C4_competitorHonesty":1,"C6_crossSlotCoherence":1,"C1_customerSpecificity":1,"C2_problemFrictionRealism":1,"C9_killCriteriaAttestability":1,"C3_approachEngineCoverability":1,"C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape":1},"upperRightLoserville":true},"cellRef":{"id":"work-contexts.org.ai/real-estate-sales-agents-property-disclosure-review","stableHash":"wcc:real-estate-sales-agents:property-disclosure-review:document:v1"},"problem":{"slotStatement":"Buyer's agents get a 40-120 page disclosure packet (TDS, SPQ, NHD, HOA docs, prelim title, inspection addenda) 3-5 days before contingency removal and must flag material defects, inconsistencies between disclosures, and advisory items for the client — most skim, miss cross-document contradictions (seller checked 'no' on roof leak in TDS but inspection report notes active staining), and the brokerage eats the E&O exposure when the buyer sues 18 months later."},"approach":{"oneSentence":"A disclosure-packet review binder that cross-references every TDS/SPQ/NHD/inspection field against the other documents in the packet, scores each material-fact claim against a broker-approved review rubric, and hands the agent a review-ready advisory memo with per-claim citations back to the exact page and checkbox in the source PDF."},"customer":{"icpShape":"Regional residential real estate brokerages with 50-500 licensed agents in multi-disclosure states (CA, TX, WA), where the buyer is the Broker of Record / Designated Broker (who signs E&O policy renewals and tooling contracts) and the daily user is the buyer's-side sales agent reviewing TDS/SPQ/NHD packets for clients","beachheadShape":"EarlyAdopterJTBD: California buyer's-agent teams at 100-300 agent brokerages already burned by at least one post-close disclosure-related arbitration claim in the last 24 months"},"archetype":"startup-archetypes.org.ai/HeadlessSaaS-MoneyOnDelivery","beachhead":"EarlyAdopterJTBD: California buyer's-agent teams at 100-300 agent brokerages already burned by at least one post-close disclosure-related arbitration claim in the last 24 months","competitors":{"substitutes":[{"name":"Agent manually skimming the packet the night before contingency removal","category":"status-quo"},{"name":"Glide / Skyslope / Dotloop disclosure-checklist workflows","category":"incumbent"},{"name":"ChatGPT / Claude with the PDFs pasted in","category":"AI-native horizontal"},{"name":"Outside real-estate attorney review retained by the buyer","category":"human alternative"}]},"studioThesis":"T-BU","killThreshold":{"K":8,"M":30,"N":7,"rubricItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C7_magicLensFit","C8_lensFit","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicy":"all-load-bearing-pass-and-overall-ge-X","loadBearingItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicyVerbatim":"KILL unless every load-bearing rubric item passes per workbook AND overall pass-rate ≥ 7/9 (CASCADE.md §4 Stage 9 commit threshold)."},"lifecycleState":"Active","differentiation":{"twoByTwo":{"xAxis":"Cross-document reconciliation depth (single-doc summary ↔ every claim checked against every other doc in the packet with contradiction flags)","yAxis":"E&O audit posture (agent-facing tip ↔ broker-signed rubric producing a retained review memo admissible in arbitration)","winningQuadrant":"full cross-packet contradiction detection bound to a broker-approved rubric with a retained, page-cited advisory memo per transaction","loservilleEscape":true,"loservilleQuadrant":"single-document AI summary with no contradiction logic and no retained record — where ChatGPT paste-ins and Dotloop's checklist both sit today, since neither reconciles TDS Q11 against the inspection addendum nor produces anything the broker can hand to their E&O carrier"}},"unmetRequirements":[],"pricingArchitecture":"usage-meter"},"actions":{},"options":{},"relationships":{"runtimeUnit":"https://api.sb/v1/runtime-units?startupRef=startup%3Afh%3Areal-estate-sales-agents-property-disclosure-review%3At-bu%3Av1","brand":"https://api.sb/v1/brands?startupId=startup%3Afh%3Areal-estate-sales-agents-property-disclosure-review%3At-bu%3Av1","listing":"https://api.services/listings?foundingHypothesisRef=fh%3Areal-estate-sales-agents-property-disclosure-review%3At-bu%3Av1","cell":"https://api.sb/v1/cells/work-contexts.org.ai/real-estate-sales-agents-property-disclosure-review","thesis":"https://api.sb/v1/theses/T-BU"},"meta":{"level":"L0","scopes":[]},"user":{"requestId":"a057bd526e4fb1a9","edgeLocation":"a057bd526e4fb1a9","geo":{"country":"US"},"ua":{"browser":"Claude"}},"references":{"total":0,"limit":25,"page":1,"links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Areal-estate-sales-agents-property-disclosure-review%3At-bu%3Av1/references"},"items":[]}}