{"api":{"name":"api.sb","description":"Business-as-Code surface for Startups.Studio","home":"https://api.sb","docs":"https://api.sb/docs","version":"1.0.0"},"$context":"https://api.sb/$context","$type":"FoundingHypothesis","$id":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Asales-managers-territory-quota-setting%3At-td%3Av1","links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Asales-managers-territory-quota-setting%3At-td%3Av1","canonical":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Asales-managers-territory-quota-setting%3At-td%3Av1","pool":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses"},"foundingHypothesis":{"id":"fh:sales-managers-territory-quota-setting:t-td:v1","lens":"ManagedWorkflow","type":"founding-hypothesis","click":{"rubricScores":{"C8_lensFit":0,"C7_magicLensFit":1,"C4_competitorHonesty":1,"C6_crossSlotCoherence":1,"C1_customerSpecificity":1,"C2_problemFrictionRealism":1,"C9_killCriteriaAttestability":1,"C3_approachEngineCoverability":1,"C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape":1},"upperRightLoserville":true},"cellRef":{"id":"work-contexts.org.ai/sales-managers-territory-quota-setting","stableHash":"wcc:sales-managers:territory-quota-setting:document:v1"},"problem":{"slotStatement":"When the Q4 territory redraw drops, reps immediately file grievances claiming their patch is under-weighted vs peers, and SalesOps has no defensible side-by-side showing how TAM, account tier, historical attainment, and coverage were weighted per rep — so the CRO overrides quotas ad hoc and plan credibility collapses before February."},"approach":{"oneSentence":"A territory-fairness binder that scores every proposed patch against a SalesOps-editable rubric (TAM balance, tier mix, ramp-adjusted attainment, travel load), attaches the primary-source Salesforce/Clari pulls behind each score, and ships a per-rep review-ready PDF the CRO can hand to any rep who escalates."},"customer":{"icpShape":"VP of Sales Operations at $200M–$1B B2B SaaS companies (150–600 quota-carrying reps across 8+ territories) where the buyer is the VP of Sales Operations and the daily user is the Sales Operations Analyst who runs the annual territory/quota redraw","beachheadShape":"EarlyMajorityWorkflow — B2B SaaS RevOps teams doing an annual Q4 territory+quota redraw who already get rep grievances escalated to the CRO every January"},"archetype":"startup-archetypes.org.ai/ManagedWorkflow-MoneyOnDelivery","beachhead":"EarlyMajorityWorkflow — B2B SaaS RevOps teams doing an annual Q4 territory+quota redraw who already get rep grievances escalated to the CRO every January","competitors":{"substitutes":[{"name":"Xactly AlignStar / Varicent Territory & Quota Planning","category":"incumbent"},{"name":"SalesOps-built Excel/Google Sheets fairness models with pivot tables","category":"status-quo"},{"name":"Fullcast territory planning","category":"adjacent vertical"},{"name":"ChatGPT Enterprise + Snowflake SQL copilot used ad-hoc by the analyst","category":"AI-native horizontal"}]},"studioThesis":"T-TD","killThreshold":{"K":8,"M":30,"N":7,"rubricItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C7_magicLensFit","C8_lensFit","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicy":"all-load-bearing-pass-and-overall-ge-X","loadBearingItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicyVerbatim":"KILL unless every load-bearing rubric item passes per workbook AND overall pass-rate ≥ 7/9 (CASCADE.md §4 Stage 9 commit threshold)."},"lifecycleState":"Active","differentiation":{"twoByTwo":{"xAxis":"Per-rep evidence trace (one headline fairness number ↔ every weight backed by the underlying SFDC/Clari row-level pull)","yAxis":"Rubric editability by SalesOps (vendor-locked fairness model ↔ SalesOps analyst edits the rubric weights in-tool each planning cycle)","winningQuadrant":"row-level evidence per rep combined with a SalesOps-edited rubric that regenerates the review-ready binder on every weight change","loservilleEscape":true,"loservilleQuadrant":"Xactly AlignStar's vendor-locked optimization output that gives a single 'balanced' score with no per-rep citation trail, forcing SalesOps to rebuild the justification in Excel when a rep escalates"}},"unmetRequirements":[],"pricingArchitecture":"usage-meter"},"actions":{},"options":{},"relationships":{"runtimeUnit":"https://api.sb/v1/runtime-units?startupRef=startup%3Afh%3Asales-managers-territory-quota-setting%3At-td%3Av1","brand":"https://api.sb/v1/brands?startupId=startup%3Afh%3Asales-managers-territory-quota-setting%3At-td%3Av1","listing":"https://api.services/listings?foundingHypothesisRef=fh%3Asales-managers-territory-quota-setting%3At-td%3Av1","cell":"https://api.sb/v1/cells/work-contexts.org.ai/sales-managers-territory-quota-setting","thesis":"https://api.sb/v1/theses/T-TD"},"meta":{"level":"L0","scopes":[]},"user":{"requestId":"a0575bbcabcba8fe","edgeLocation":"a0575bbcabcba8fe","geo":{"country":"US"},"ua":{"browser":"Claude"}},"references":{"total":0,"limit":25,"page":1,"links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Asales-managers-territory-quota-setting%3At-td%3Av1/references"},"items":[]}}