{"api":{"name":"api.sb","description":"Business-as-Code surface for Startups.Studio","home":"https://api.sb","docs":"https://api.sb/docs","version":"1.0.0"},"$context":"https://api.sb/$context","$type":"FoundingHypothesis","$id":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Asoftware-developers-technical-design-document%3At-hsa%3Av1","links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Asoftware-developers-technical-design-document%3At-hsa%3Av1","canonical":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Asoftware-developers-technical-design-document%3At-hsa%3Av1","pool":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses"},"foundingHypothesis":{"id":"fh:software-developers-technical-design-document:t-hsa:v1","lens":"Marketplace","type":"founding-hypothesis","click":{"rubricScores":{"C8_lensFit":0,"C7_magicLensFit":0,"C4_competitorHonesty":1,"C6_crossSlotCoherence":1,"C1_customerSpecificity":1,"C2_problemFrictionRealism":1,"C9_killCriteriaAttestability":1,"C3_approachEngineCoverability":1,"C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape":1},"upperRightLoserville":true},"cellRef":{"id":"work-contexts.org.ai/software-developers-technical-design-document","stableHash":"wcc:software-developers:technical-design-document:document:v1"},"problem":{"slotStatement":"Staff engineers and architecture reviewers can't reliably catch the design-level gaps that matter — missing failure-mode analysis, unstated capacity assumptions, half-specified migration plans — so TDDs bounce through 3–4 review rounds, block sprint starts for weeks, and the exceptions that do slip through surface as incidents months later with no traceable record of who approved which tradeoff."},"approach":{"oneSentence":"A design-review rubric engine that scores each TDD section against a team-owned checklist (failure modes, capacity, rollback, data-migration, security boundary), escalates the specific unmet criteria back to the author with cited passages, and emits a review-ready sign-off record that the architecture council countersigns inline in the doc."},"customer":{"icpShape":"Platform/infra engineering orgs at Series-C to post-IPO SaaS companies (200–2,000 engineers, targetCompanyType Occupation/SoftwareDeveloper) running a formal Technical Design Document + Architecture Review gate before staffing work, where the buyer is the VP of Engineering (or Head of Platform) who signs the tooling PO and the daily user is the staff/principal engineer authoring the TDD and the reviewers on the architecture council.","beachheadShape":"EarlyAdopterJTBD: fintech and dev-infra SaaS platform teams whose architecture council already requires a written TDD + reviewer sign-off before sprint kickoff"},"archetype":"startup-archetypes.org.ai/Marketplace-UsageMetered","beachhead":"EarlyAdopterJTBD: fintech and dev-infra SaaS platform teams whose architecture council already requires a written TDD + reviewer sign-off before sprint kickoff","competitors":{"substitutes":[{"name":"Tool-trained-staff (senior reviewers doing manual TDD review in Google Docs / Confluence)","category":"human alternative"},{"name":"Confluence + Jira architecture-review templates with manual reviewer checklists","category":"incumbent"},{"name":"LinearB / Swarmia engineering-workflow analytics","category":"adjacent vertical"},{"name":"GitHub Copilot Workspace / CodeRabbit design-review suggestions","category":"AI-native horizontal"}]},"studioThesis":"T-HSA","killThreshold":{"K":8,"M":40,"N":7,"rubricItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C7_magicLensFit","C8_lensFit","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicy":"all-load-bearing-pass-and-overall-ge-X","loadBearingItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicyVerbatim":"KILL unless every load-bearing rubric item passes per workbook AND overall pass-rate ≥ 7/9 (CASCADE.md §4 Stage 9 commit threshold)."},"lifecycleState":"Active","differentiation":{"twoByTwo":{"xAxis":"Review evidence trace (free-text reviewer comment ↔ rubric-criterion citation linked to the exact TDD passage and prior-incident precedent)","yAxis":"Council authority binding (suggestion a human may ignore ↔ countersigned sign-off record the council is accountable to)","winningQuadrant":"criterion-cited findings bound to a countersigned architecture-council sign-off that travels with the TDD into the incident postmortem","loservilleEscape":true,"loservilleQuadrant":"Copilot Workspace / CodeRabbit style free-text design suggestions that reviewers paste as Confluence comments with no rubric citation and no binding sign-off trail"}},"unmetRequirements":[],"pricingArchitecture":"usage-meter"},"actions":{},"options":{},"relationships":{"runtimeUnit":"https://api.sb/v1/runtime-units?startupRef=startup%3Afh%3Asoftware-developers-technical-design-document%3At-hsa%3Av1","brand":"https://api.sb/v1/brands?startupId=startup%3Afh%3Asoftware-developers-technical-design-document%3At-hsa%3Av1","listing":"https://api.services/listings?foundingHypothesisRef=fh%3Asoftware-developers-technical-design-document%3At-hsa%3Av1","cell":"https://api.sb/v1/cells/work-contexts.org.ai/software-developers-technical-design-document","thesis":"https://api.sb/v1/theses/T-HSA"},"meta":{"level":"L0","scopes":[]},"user":{"requestId":"a05757ff9862a9c0","edgeLocation":"a05757ff9862a9c0","geo":{"country":"US"},"ua":{"browser":"Claude"}},"references":{"total":0,"limit":25,"page":1,"links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Asoftware-developers-technical-design-document%3At-hsa%3Av1/references"},"items":[]}}