{"api":{"name":"api.sb","description":"Business-as-Code surface for Startups.Studio","home":"https://api.sb","docs":"https://api.sb/docs","version":"1.0.0"},"$context":"https://api.sb/$context","$type":"FoundingHypothesis","$id":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw2-capacity-planning-demand-planner-demand-signal%3At-dev-infra%3Av1","links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw2-capacity-planning-demand-planner-demand-signal%3At-dev-infra%3Av1","canonical":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw2-capacity-planning-demand-planner-demand-signal%3At-dev-infra%3Av1","pool":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses"},"foundingHypothesis":{"id":"fh:w2-capacity-planning-demand-planner-demand-signal:t-dev-infra:v1","lens":"AgenticWorkflow","type":"founding-hypothesis","click":{"rubricScores":{"C8_lensFit":1,"C7_magicLensFit":1,"C4_competitorHonesty":1,"C6_crossSlotCoherence":1,"C1_customerSpecificity":1,"C2_problemFrictionRealism":1,"C9_killCriteriaAttestability":1,"C3_approachEngineCoverability":1,"C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape":1},"upperRightLoserville":true},"cellRef":{"id":"work-contexts.org.ai/w2-capacity-planning-demand-planner-demand-signal","stableHash":"wcc:demand-planner:capacity-planning:demand-signal:v1"},"problem":{"slotStatement":"Demand planners spend three days each cycle reconciling statistical baseline forecasts against sales-team overrides and promo lifts, then hand a capacity-ready demand signal to the plant without any traceable record of which overrides were accepted, why, or what the downstream fill-rate risk is — so when the plant misses, the planner cannot defend the signal in the S&OP review"},"approach":{"oneSentence":"A demand-signal attestation pipeline that reconciles statistical baselines, sales overrides, and promo lifts inside SAP IBP, scores each override against a planner-editable rubric, and emits a review-ready signal with a line-item traceable record of every accepted, rejected, or escalated adjustment for the S&OP meeting"},"customer":{"icpShape":"North American mid-market consumer-goods manufacturers ($250M–$2B revenue) with SKU counts 2k–20k running SAP IBP or Kinaxis, where the buyer is the VP of Supply Chain Planning (budget owner) and the daily user is the Demand Planner maintaining the statistical forecast and S&OP capacity signal","beachheadShape":"EarlyMajorityWorkflow — CPG demand-planning teams running monthly S&OP with SAP IBP who must hand capacity-constrained demand signals to plant schedulers"},"archetype":"startup-archetypes.org.ai/AgenticWorkflow-MarketplaceClearing","beachhead":"EarlyMajorityWorkflow — CPG demand-planning teams running monthly S&OP with SAP IBP who must hand capacity-constrained demand signals to plant schedulers","competitors":{"substitutes":[{"name":"SAP IBP Demand (statistical forecast + Excel override workbook)","category":"incumbent"},{"name":"Kinaxis Maestro Demand.AI","category":"incumbent"},{"name":"o9 Solutions Demand Planning","category":"adjacent vertical"},{"name":"Planner-maintained Excel consensus workbook emailed around S&OP","category":"status-quo"}]},"studioThesis":"T-DEV-INFRA","killThreshold":{"K":10,"M":55,"N":9,"rubricItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C7_magicLensFit","C8_lensFit","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicy":"all-load-bearing-pass-and-overall-ge-X","loadBearingItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicyVerbatim":"KILL unless every load-bearing rubric item passes per workbook AND overall pass-rate ≥ 9/9 (CASCADE.md §4 Stage 9 commit threshold)."},"lifecycleState":"Active","differentiation":{"twoByTwo":{"xAxis":"Override auditability (signal handed off as a single number ↔ every override carries planner-editable rationale, evidence, and accept/reject record)","yAxis":"Embedding in the S&OP system of record (sidecar BI dashboard ↔ native inside SAP IBP planning view with write-back to the capacity signal)","winningQuadrant":"Line-item override rationale surfaced inside the SAP IBP planning book, write-back to the capacity signal, defensible in the S&OP review","loservilleEscape":true,"loservilleQuadrant":"Kinaxis Maestro Demand.AI-style probabilistic forecast adjustment delivered as an unexplained number in a sidecar dashboard — planner cannot answer 'why did the signal change?' when the plant misses fill-rate"}},"unmetRequirements":[],"pricingArchitecture":"usage-meter"},"actions":{},"options":{},"relationships":{"runtimeUnit":"https://api.sb/v1/runtime-units?startupRef=startup%3Afh%3Aw2-capacity-planning-demand-planner-demand-signal%3At-dev-infra%3Av1","brand":"https://api.sb/v1/brands?startupId=startup%3Afh%3Aw2-capacity-planning-demand-planner-demand-signal%3At-dev-infra%3Av1","listing":"https://api.services/listings?foundingHypothesisRef=fh%3Aw2-capacity-planning-demand-planner-demand-signal%3At-dev-infra%3Av1","cell":"https://api.sb/v1/cells/work-contexts.org.ai/w2-capacity-planning-demand-planner-demand-signal","thesis":"https://api.sb/v1/theses/T-DEV-INFRA"},"meta":{"level":"L0","scopes":[]},"user":{"requestId":"a057bac66d50b071","edgeLocation":"a057bac66d50b071","geo":{"country":"US"},"ua":{"browser":"Claude"}},"references":{"total":0,"limit":25,"page":1,"links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw2-capacity-planning-demand-planner-demand-signal%3At-dev-infra%3Av1/references"},"items":[]}}