{"api":{"name":"api.sb","description":"Business-as-Code surface for Startups.Studio","home":"https://api.sb","docs":"https://api.sb/docs","version":"1.0.0"},"$context":"https://api.sb/$context","$type":"FoundingHypothesis","$id":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw2-demand-planning-capacity-planner-production-schedule%3At-dev-infra%3Av1","links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw2-demand-planning-capacity-planner-production-schedule%3At-dev-infra%3Av1","canonical":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw2-demand-planning-capacity-planner-production-schedule%3At-dev-infra%3Av1","pool":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses"},"foundingHypothesis":{"id":"fh:w2-demand-planning-capacity-planner-production-schedule:t-dev-infra:v1","lens":"AIService","type":"founding-hypothesis","click":{"rubricScores":{"C8_lensFit":0,"C7_magicLensFit":0,"C4_competitorHonesty":1,"C6_crossSlotCoherence":1,"C1_customerSpecificity":1,"C2_problemFrictionRealism":1,"C9_killCriteriaAttestability":1,"C3_approachEngineCoverability":1,"C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape":1},"upperRightLoserville":true},"cellRef":{"id":"work-contexts.org.ai/w2-demand-planning-capacity-planner-production-schedule","stableHash":"wcc:capacity-planner:demand-planning:production-schedule:v1"},"problem":{"slotStatement":"Every S&OP cycle, the capacity planner hand-reconciles the constrained production schedule against the unconstrained demand plan in Excel, and when the plant GM or finance challenges a load-leveling decision on a bottleneck work center, there is no line-item record showing which demand signal, which routing, and which capacity assumption drove the override — so the sign-off slips 3–5 days and overtime gets approved on gut feel"},"approach":{"oneSentence":"A capacity-plan defense binder that reconciles each work-center load decision against the demand plan, routings, and calendar, and certifies every override with a review-ready citation back to the exact MRP line, forecast bucket, and constraint that justified it"},"customer":{"icpShape":"North American discrete manufacturers ($250M–$2B revenue) running SAP IBP or Oracle Demantra for S&OP, where the buyer is the VP of Supply Chain (or Director of S&OP) who owns the planning-systems budget and the daily user is the Capacity/Master Production Scheduler building the weekly RCCP and finite-capacity schedule","beachheadShape":"EarlyAdopterJTBD — mid-market discrete manufacturers whose monthly S&OP sign-off is blocked because the capacity plan can't be defended line-by-line against the demand plan to the plant controller"},"archetype":"startup-archetypes.org.ai/AIService-MarketplaceClearing","beachhead":"EarlyAdopterJTBD — mid-market discrete manufacturers whose monthly S&OP sign-off is blocked because the capacity plan can't be defended line-by-line against the demand plan to the plant controller","competitors":{"substitutes":[{"name":"SAP IBP Response & Supply (with PP/DS)","category":"incumbent"},{"name":"Kinaxis RapidResponse capacity scenarios","category":"incumbent"},{"name":"Oracle Demantra + ASCP finite scheduling","category":"incumbent"},{"name":"Planner-maintained Excel RCCP workbook pulled from ERP","category":"status-quo"}]},"studioThesis":"T-DEV-INFRA","killThreshold":{"K":9,"M":60,"N":7,"rubricItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C7_magicLensFit","C8_lensFit","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicy":"all-load-bearing-pass-and-overall-ge-X","loadBearingItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicyVerbatim":"KILL unless every load-bearing rubric item passes per workbook AND overall pass-rate ≥ 7/9 (CASCADE.md §4 Stage 9 commit threshold)."},"lifecycleState":"Active","differentiation":{"twoByTwo":{"xAxis":"Override traceability (decision logged as free-text note ↔ each override cites the MRP line, routing op, and capacity bucket that drove it)","yAxis":"S&OP sign-off artifact (planner exports a PDF deck after the fact ↔ defense binder is generated inside the planning screen as the schedule is committed)","winningQuadrant":"per-override citations to MRP/routing/capacity, produced live inside the IBP or Kinaxis screen at commit time","loservilleEscape":true,"loservilleQuadrant":"Kinaxis/IBP scenarios where the planner's rationale lives in a separate Excel tab and the PDF deck is assembled the morning of the S&OP meeting"}},"unmetRequirements":[],"pricingArchitecture":"usage-meter"},"actions":{},"options":{},"relationships":{"runtimeUnit":"https://api.sb/v1/runtime-units?startupRef=startup%3Afh%3Aw2-demand-planning-capacity-planner-production-schedule%3At-dev-infra%3Av1","brand":"https://api.sb/v1/brands?startupId=startup%3Afh%3Aw2-demand-planning-capacity-planner-production-schedule%3At-dev-infra%3Av1","listing":"https://api.services/listings?foundingHypothesisRef=fh%3Aw2-demand-planning-capacity-planner-production-schedule%3At-dev-infra%3Av1","cell":"https://api.sb/v1/cells/work-contexts.org.ai/w2-demand-planning-capacity-planner-production-schedule","thesis":"https://api.sb/v1/theses/T-DEV-INFRA"},"meta":{"level":"L0","scopes":[]},"user":{"requestId":"a057b99d7941a5f3","edgeLocation":"a057b99d7941a5f3","geo":{"country":"US"},"ua":{"browser":"Claude"}},"references":{"total":0,"limit":25,"page":1,"links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw2-demand-planning-capacity-planner-production-schedule%3At-dev-infra%3Av1/references"},"items":[]}}