{"api":{"name":"api.sb","description":"Business-as-Code surface for Startups.Studio","home":"https://api.sb","docs":"https://api.sb/docs","version":"1.0.0"},"$context":"https://api.sb/$context","$type":"FoundingHypothesis","$id":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw2-supply-planning-procurement-specialist-purchase-order%3At-low%3Av1","links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw2-supply-planning-procurement-specialist-purchase-order%3At-low%3Av1","canonical":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw2-supply-planning-procurement-specialist-purchase-order%3At-low%3Av1","pool":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses"},"foundingHypothesis":{"id":"fh:w2-supply-planning-procurement-specialist-purchase-order:t-low:v1","lens":"Marketplace","type":"founding-hypothesis","click":{"rubricScores":{"C8_lensFit":0,"C7_magicLensFit":0,"C4_competitorHonesty":1,"C6_crossSlotCoherence":1,"C1_customerSpecificity":1,"C2_problemFrictionRealism":1,"C9_killCriteriaAttestability":1,"C3_approachEngineCoverability":1,"C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape":1},"upperRightLoserville":true},"cellRef":{"id":"work-contexts.org.ai/w2-supply-planning-procurement-specialist-purchase-order","stableHash":"wcc:procurement-specialist:supply-planning:purchase-order:v1"},"problem":{"slotStatement":"Procurement Specialists spend 40%+ of their week manually re-sourcing PO line items when incumbent suppliers miss acknowledgment SLAs or quote past-due lead times, with no review-ready record of which alternates were considered, why they were rejected, and whether quoted lead times and unit costs actually held — leaving VPs of Supply Chain unable to defend expedite spend in QBRs"},"approach":{"oneSentence":"A supplier-rebid marketplace that, the moment a PO line slips acknowledgment or lead-time SLA, auto-solicits quotes from pre-qualified alternates against a buyer-owned scoring rubric (lead time, unit cost, quality history, MOQ fit) and writes a traceable record of every bid, score, and award decision back into the PO screen in NetSuite/SAP for procurement-manager sign-off"},"customer":{"icpShape":"Mid-market industrial distributors and contract manufacturers ($50M–$500M revenue, NAICS 332/333/423) where the buyer is the VP of Supply Chain or Director of Procurement who signs the tooling PO, and the daily user is the Procurement Specialist running PO issuance, acknowledgment chasing, and supplier expedite loops inside NetSuite or SAP","beachheadShape":"EarlyAdopterJTBD — Procurement teams at mid-market discrete manufacturers drowning in unacknowledged POs and expedite fire-drills against a shrinking approved-supplier base"},"archetype":"startup-archetypes.org.ai/Marketplace-MarketplaceClearing","beachhead":"EarlyAdopterJTBD — Procurement teams at mid-market discrete manufacturers drowning in unacknowledged POs and expedite fire-drills against a shrinking approved-supplier base","competitors":{"substitutes":[{"name":"Coupa / Jaggaer sourcing modules","category":"incumbent"},{"name":"Manual RFQ-by-email using the specialist's supplier rolodex","category":"status-quo"},{"name":"Pando / Keelvar autonomous sourcing agents","category":"AI-native horizontal"},{"name":"Outsourced sourcing BPO (GEP, Genpact)","category":"human alternative"}]},"studioThesis":"T-LOW","killThreshold":{"K":8,"M":30,"N":7,"rubricItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C7_magicLensFit","C8_lensFit","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicy":"all-load-bearing-pass-and-overall-ge-X","loadBearingItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicyVerbatim":"KILL unless every load-bearing rubric item passes per workbook AND overall pass-rate ≥ 7/9 (CASCADE.md §4 Stage 9 commit threshold)."},"lifecycleState":"Active","differentiation":{"twoByTwo":{"xAxis":"Award-decision traceability (opaque 'agent picked supplier X' ↔ line-item bid log with rubric scores citable in QBR)","yAxis":"Supplier panel provenance (platform-owned generic marketplace ↔ buyer's own approved-vendor-list with pre-negotiated MSAs)","winningQuadrant":"rubric-scored bid log written into the PO screen, sourcing only from the buyer's own AVL with active MSAs","loservilleEscape":true,"loservilleQuadrant":"Pando-style autonomous agents that award to platform-curated suppliers with a one-line rationale — procurement managers cannot defend the award in audit and legal cannot confirm MSA coverage"}},"unmetRequirements":[],"pricingArchitecture":"usage-meter"},"actions":{},"options":{},"relationships":{"runtimeUnit":"https://api.sb/v1/runtime-units?startupRef=startup%3Afh%3Aw2-supply-planning-procurement-specialist-purchase-order%3At-low%3Av1","brand":"https://api.sb/v1/brands?startupId=startup%3Afh%3Aw2-supply-planning-procurement-specialist-purchase-order%3At-low%3Av1","listing":"https://api.services/listings?foundingHypothesisRef=fh%3Aw2-supply-planning-procurement-specialist-purchase-order%3At-low%3Av1","cell":"https://api.sb/v1/cells/work-contexts.org.ai/w2-supply-planning-procurement-specialist-purchase-order","thesis":"https://api.sb/v1/theses/T-LOW"},"meta":{"level":"L0","scopes":[]},"user":{"requestId":"a0575aef088490ce","edgeLocation":"a0575aef088490ce","geo":{"country":"US"},"ua":{"browser":"Claude"}},"references":{"total":0,"limit":25,"page":1,"links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw2-supply-planning-procurement-specialist-purchase-order%3At-low%3Av1/references"},"items":[]}}