{"api":{"name":"api.sb","description":"Business-as-Code surface for Startups.Studio","home":"https://api.sb","docs":"https://api.sb/docs","version":"1.0.0"},"$context":"https://api.sb/$context","$type":"FoundingHypothesis","$id":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw3-23-1011-01-dwa-analyzing-data%3At-hsa%3Av1","links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw3-23-1011-01-dwa-analyzing-data%3At-hsa%3Av1","canonical":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw3-23-1011-01-dwa-analyzing-data%3At-hsa%3Av1","pool":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses"},"foundingHypothesis":{"id":"fh:w3-23-1011-01-dwa-analyzing-data:t-hsa:v1","lens":"AIService","type":"founding-hypothesis","click":{"rubricScores":{"C8_lensFit":0,"C7_magicLensFit":1,"C4_competitorHonesty":1,"C6_crossSlotCoherence":1,"C1_customerSpecificity":1,"C2_problemFrictionRealism":1,"C9_killCriteriaAttestability":1,"C3_approachEngineCoverability":1,"C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape":1},"upperRightLoserville":true},"cellRef":{"id":"work-contexts.org.ai/w3-23-1011-01-dwa-analyzing-data","stableHash":"wcc:23-1011-01:dwa-analyzing-data:document:w3:v1"},"problem":{"slotStatement":"Patent group COOs field quarterly partner questions about attorney allowance rates, examiner win-rates, and art-unit profitability, but the underlying USPTO PAIR pulls, docket exports, and timesheet joins are stitched together by hand in Excel with no traceable record linking each reported number back to the PAIR event or docket entry that produced it."},"approach":{"oneSentence":"A PAIR-to-docket reconciliation engine that assembles every partner-facing performance number (allowance rate, RCE incidence, examiner-adjusted cycle time) from versioned USPTO bulk-data snapshots joined to the firm's docketing system, and ships each metric with an inline citation chain down to the originating office-action PDF so the report is review-ready for the compensation committee."},"customer":{"icpShape":"US-based patent prosecution law firms of 50-250 attorneys (boutique IP firms and IP groups inside AmLaw 200) where the buyer is the Chief Operating Officer or Managing Partner of the patent group and the daily user is the patent practitioner or docketing analyst pulling examiner statistics and attorney performance metrics","beachheadShape":"EarlyAdopterJTBD: boutique IP prosecution firms (50-150 attorneys) whose COO already pays for Juristat or LexisNexis PatentAdvisor and is under partner pressure to defend realization rates and allowance-per-hour numbers quarterly"},"archetype":"startup-archetypes.org.ai/AIService-UsageMetered","beachhead":"EarlyAdopterJTBD: boutique IP prosecution firms (50-150 attorneys) whose COO already pays for Juristat or LexisNexis PatentAdvisor and is under partner pressure to defend realization rates and allowance-per-hour numbers quarterly","competitors":{"substitutes":[{"name":"Juristat","category":"incumbent"},{"name":"LexisNexis PatentAdvisor","category":"incumbent"},{"name":"in-house analyst with Excel + Foundationip/CPA exports","category":"status-quo"},{"name":"Harvey or generic legal-GPT assistants","category":"AI-native horizontal"}]},"studioThesis":"T-HSA","killThreshold":{"K":8,"M":30,"N":7,"rubricItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C7_magicLensFit","C8_lensFit","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicy":"all-load-bearing-pass-and-overall-ge-X","loadBearingItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicyVerbatim":"KILL unless every load-bearing rubric item passes per workbook AND overall pass-rate ≥ 7/9 (CASCADE.md §4 Stage 9 commit threshold)."},"lifecycleState":"Active","differentiation":{"twoByTwo":{"xAxis":"Evidence trace (aggregate benchmark number ↔ every metric drills to the specific PAIR office-action and docket entry)","yAxis":"Scope of record (USPTO public data only ↔ USPTO data joined to the firm's private docket, timesheets, and billing realization)","winningQuadrant":"per-attorney performance numbers that drill from the partner deck down to the exact PAIR event AND the firm's own docket/timesheet row","loservilleEscape":true,"loservilleQuadrant":"Juristat-style industry benchmark dashboards that show examiner allowance rates with no linkage to the firm's private docket or billing — useful for pitch decks but rejected by a compensation committee that wants to see which attorney, on which matter, drove the number"}},"unmetRequirements":[],"pricingArchitecture":"usage-meter"},"actions":{},"options":{},"relationships":{"runtimeUnit":"https://api.sb/v1/runtime-units?startupRef=startup%3Afh%3Aw3-23-1011-01-dwa-analyzing-data%3At-hsa%3Av1","brand":"https://api.sb/v1/brands?startupId=startup%3Afh%3Aw3-23-1011-01-dwa-analyzing-data%3At-hsa%3Av1","listing":"https://api.services/listings?foundingHypothesisRef=fh%3Aw3-23-1011-01-dwa-analyzing-data%3At-hsa%3Av1","cell":"https://api.sb/v1/cells/work-contexts.org.ai/w3-23-1011-01-dwa-analyzing-data","thesis":"https://api.sb/v1/theses/T-HSA"},"meta":{"level":"L0","scopes":[]},"user":{"requestId":"a0575a7a5f750555","edgeLocation":"a0575a7a5f750555","geo":{"country":"US"},"ua":{"browser":"Claude"}},"references":{"total":0,"limit":25,"page":1,"links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw3-23-1011-01-dwa-analyzing-data%3At-hsa%3Av1/references"},"items":[]}}