{"api":{"name":"api.sb","description":"Business-as-Code surface for Startups.Studio","home":"https://api.sb","docs":"https://api.sb/docs","version":"1.0.0"},"$context":"https://api.sb/$context","$type":"FoundingHypothesis","$id":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw3-49-9071-dwa-documenting-information%3Av1","links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw3-49-9071-dwa-documenting-information%3Av1","canonical":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw3-49-9071-dwa-documenting-information%3Av1","pool":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses"},"foundingHypothesis":{"id":"fh:w3-49-9071-dwa-documenting-information:v1","lens":"AIService","type":"founding-hypothesis","click":{"rubricScores":{"C8_lensFit":1,"C7_magicLensFit":1,"C4_competitorHonesty":1,"C6_crossSlotCoherence":1,"C1_customerSpecificity":1,"C2_problemFrictionRealism":1,"C9_killCriteriaAttestability":1,"C3_approachEngineCoverability":1,"C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape":1},"upperRightLoserville":true},"cellRef":{"id":"work-contexts.org.ai/w3-49-9071-dwa-documenting-information","stableHash":"wcc:49-9071:dwa-documenting-information:document:w3:v1"},"problem":{"slotStatement":"Maintenance technicians close work orders in the CMMS with one-line notes like 'fixed leak' or 'reset breaker', leaving reliability engineers and auditors without the root cause, parts used, readings taken, or step sequence needed to pass PM audits, defend warranty claims, or build a usable asset history — so supervisors spend evenings re-interviewing techs and rewriting records."},"approach":{"oneSentence":"A mobile voice-and-photo capture agent that interviews the technician at job close-out, extracts the structured fields a CMMS work-order history requires (asset, failure mode, corrective action, parts, readings, time-on-tool), and emits a review-ready record scored against the site's documentation rubric before it writes back to Maximo/Fiix/UpKeep."},"customer":{"icpShape":"Regional multi-site facilities and property management firms (150–1,500 technicians) servicing commercial real estate, hospitals, or manufacturing plants, where the buyer is the VP of Facilities Operations or Director of Maintenance Reliability and the daily user is the maintenance technician and their working foreman closing out work orders in the CMMS.","beachheadShape":"EarlyMajorityWorkflow: mid-market facilities maintenance teams under a preventive-maintenance compliance mandate (Joint Commission EC, OSHA 1910, or insurer-driven reliability audits) whose CMMS work-order close-outs are failing QA sampling."},"archetype":"startup-archetypes.org.ai/AIService-MoneyOnDelivery","beachhead":"EarlyMajorityWorkflow: mid-market facilities maintenance teams under a preventive-maintenance compliance mandate (Joint Commission EC, OSHA 1910, or insurer-driven reliability audits) whose CMMS work-order close-outs are failing QA sampling.","competitors":{"substitutes":[{"name":"Manual free-text notes inside IBM Maximo / Fiix / UpKeep work orders","category":"status-quo"},{"name":"Supervisor-led end-of-shift huddle debriefs with paper job tickets","category":"human alternative"},{"name":"Generic voice-to-text dictation (Otter, Apple Dictation) pasted into the CMMS note field","category":"AI-native horizontal"},{"name":"eMaint / Brightly Asset Essentials mobile checklists with required custom fields","category":"incumbent"}]},"studioThesis":"T-LOW","killThreshold":{"K":8,"M":30,"N":7,"rubricItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C7_magicLensFit","C8_lensFit","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicy":"all-load-bearing-pass-and-overall-ge-X","loadBearingItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence"],"verdictPolicyVerbatim":"KILL unless every load-bearing rubric item passes per workbook AND overall pass-rate ≥ 7/9 (CASCADE.md §4 Stage 9 commit threshold)."},"lifecycleState":"Active","differentiation":{"twoByTwo":{"xAxis":"Depth of technician-context capture at the tool (voice interview + photo + asset/sensor linkage) vs. free-text field entry","yAxis":"Traceability of each captured field back to a primary artifact (waveform, nameplate photo, parts scan, timestamped utterance) for audit defense","winningQuadrant":"High-depth capture AND per-field primary-source traceability — each CMMS field is backed by a linked utterance, photo, or scan that a Joint Commission or insurer auditor can click through to","loservilleEscape":true,"loservilleQuadrant":"Low-depth, low-traceability — generic voice-to-text dictation pasted into a Maximo note field: no structured asset/failure-mode fields and no linkage from any claim back to the evidence that supports it, which is exactly how Otter-style transcripts fail PM audit sampling today"}},"unmetRequirements":[],"pricingArchitecture":"usage-meter"},"actions":{},"options":{},"relationships":{"runtimeUnit":"https://api.sb/v1/runtime-units?startupRef=startup%3Afh%3Aw3-49-9071-dwa-documenting-information%3Av1","brand":"https://api.sb/v1/brands?startupId=startup%3Afh%3Aw3-49-9071-dwa-documenting-information%3Av1","listing":"https://api.services/listings?foundingHypothesisRef=fh%3Aw3-49-9071-dwa-documenting-information%3Av1","cell":"https://api.sb/v1/cells/work-contexts.org.ai/w3-49-9071-dwa-documenting-information","thesis":"https://api.sb/v1/theses/T-LOW"},"meta":{"level":"L0","scopes":[]},"user":{"requestId":"a0575aab5c0a0555","edgeLocation":"a0575aab5c0a0555","geo":{"country":"US"},"ua":{"browser":"Claude"}},"references":{"total":0,"limit":25,"page":1,"links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw3-49-9071-dwa-documenting-information%3Av1/references"},"items":[]}}