{"api":{"name":"api.sb","description":"Business-as-Code surface for Startups.Studio","home":"https://api.sb","docs":"https://api.sb/docs","version":"1.0.0"},"$context":"https://api.sb/$context","$type":"FoundingHypothesis","$id":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw3-53-2012-dwa-using-relevant-knowledge%3Av1","links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw3-53-2012-dwa-using-relevant-knowledge%3Av1","canonical":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw3-53-2012-dwa-using-relevant-knowledge%3Av1","pool":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses"},"foundingHypothesis":{"id":"fh:w3-53-2012-dwa-using-relevant-knowledge:v1","lens":"AIService","type":"founding-hypothesis","click":{"rubricScores":{"C8_lensFit":1,"C7_magicLensFit":1,"C4_competitorHonesty":1,"C6_crossSlotCoherence":1,"C1_customerSpecificity":1,"C2_problemFrictionRealism":1,"C9_killCriteriaAttestability":1,"C3_approachEngineCoverability":1,"C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape":1},"upperRightLoserville":true},"cellRef":{"id":"work-contexts.org.ai/w3-53-2012-dwa-using-relevant-knowledge","stableHash":"wcc:53-2012:dwa-using-relevant-knowledge:pure-info:w3:v1"},"problem":{"slotStatement":"Check airmen scoring a pilot's ability to apply systems/regulatory knowledge to resolve an unfolding abnormal (e.g., hydraulic failure, icing diversion) write subjective narrative grades that FAA POIs and training departments cannot defend on audit, forcing re-fly of events and weeks of grade-norming disputes."},"approach":{"oneSentence":"An AI evaluation service that ingests simulator/FOQA event data plus the check airman's observations, scores the pilot's knowledge-application against the carrier's AQP proficiency objectives, and emits a review-ready evaluation packet with each judgment traced back to the specific FOM/QRH/FAR source the decision should have invoked."},"customer":{"icpShape":"Part 121 regional and cargo airlines with 200-1,500 pilots operating under FAA AQP, where the buyer is the Director of Flight Operations / Chief Pilot and the daily user is the Line Check Airman or AQP Curriculum Developer running recurrent simulator evaluations and line checks.","beachheadShape":"EarlyAdopterJTBD: regional Part 121 carriers with fresh FAA AQP continuing-qualification cycles and known knowledge-application gaps flagged in their last LOSA/FOQA review"},"archetype":"startup-archetypes.org.ai/AIService-MoneyOnDelivery","beachhead":"EarlyAdopterJTBD: regional Part 121 carriers with fresh FAA AQP continuing-qualification cycles and known knowledge-application gaps flagged in their last LOSA/FOQA review","competitors":{"substitutes":[{"name":"CAE Rise / L3Harris PilotEdge debrief analytics","category":"incumbent"},{"name":"ForeFlight + Jeppesen reference lookup plus check-airman paper gradesheets","category":"status-quo"},{"name":"ChatGPT/Claude used ad-hoc by instructors to draft narratives","category":"AI-native horizontal"},{"name":"Contract DER/APD human standards consultants hired per audit cycle","category":"human alternative"}]},"studioThesis":"T-DEV-INFRA","killThreshold":{"K":8,"M":30,"N":7,"rubricItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C7_magicLensFit","C8_lensFit","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicy":"all-load-bearing-pass-and-overall-ge-X","loadBearingItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence"],"verdictPolicyVerbatim":"KILL unless every load-bearing rubric item passes per workbook AND overall pass-rate ≥ 7/9 (CASCADE.md §4 Stage 9 commit threshold)."},"lifecycleState":"Active","differentiation":{"twoByTwo":{"xAxis":"Depth of AQP proficiency-objective + FOM/QRH primary-source grounding (shallow keyword match ↔ per-judgment citation to the carrier's own approved manuals and AC 120-54/120-71B objectives)","yAxis":"Coupling to live simulator/FOQA event telemetry (post-hoc narrative only ↔ evaluation bound to the specific flight-parameter trace and crew callout timestamps)","winningQuadrant":"High manual-grounded citation + High telemetry-coupled: every knowledge-application grade points at the exact QRH step the pilot missed at the exact second FOQA shows the EICAS alert fired — defensible to the FAA POI without re-flying the event","loservilleEscape":true,"loservilleQuadrant":"Low grounding + Low telemetry: ChatGPT-drafted instructor narratives that paraphrase generic aeronautical knowledge with no link to the carrier's approved FOM or the actual simulator data trace — exactly the failure mode POIs reject on AQP continuing-qual audits today"}},"unmetRequirements":[],"pricingArchitecture":"usage-meter"},"actions":{},"options":{},"relationships":{"runtimeUnit":"https://api.sb/v1/runtime-units?startupRef=startup%3Afh%3Aw3-53-2012-dwa-using-relevant-knowledge%3Av1","brand":"https://api.sb/v1/brands?startupId=startup%3Afh%3Aw3-53-2012-dwa-using-relevant-knowledge%3Av1","listing":"https://api.services/listings?foundingHypothesisRef=fh%3Aw3-53-2012-dwa-using-relevant-knowledge%3Av1","cell":"https://api.sb/v1/cells/work-contexts.org.ai/w3-53-2012-dwa-using-relevant-knowledge","thesis":"https://api.sb/v1/theses/T-DEV-INFRA"},"meta":{"level":"L0","scopes":[]},"user":{"requestId":"a05758722811376a","edgeLocation":"a05758722811376a","geo":{"country":"US"},"ua":{"browser":"Claude"}},"references":{"total":0,"limit":25,"page":1,"links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw3-53-2012-dwa-using-relevant-knowledge%3Av1/references"},"items":[]}}