{"api":{"name":"api.sb","description":"Business-as-Code surface for Startups.Studio","home":"https://api.sb","docs":"https://api.sb/docs","version":"1.0.0"},"$context":"https://api.sb/$context","$type":"FoundingHypothesis","$id":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-236-buying-decision%3Av1","links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-236-buying-decision%3Av1","canonical":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-236-buying-decision%3Av1","pool":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses"},"foundingHypothesis":{"id":"fh:w4-236-buying-decision:v1","lens":"AIService","type":"founding-hypothesis","click":{"rubricScores":{"C8_lensFit":1,"C7_magicLensFit":1,"C4_competitorHonesty":1,"C6_crossSlotCoherence":1,"C1_customerSpecificity":1,"C2_problemFrictionRealism":1,"C9_killCriteriaAttestability":1,"C3_approachEngineCoverability":1,"C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape":1},"upperRightLoserville":true},"cellRef":{"id":"work-contexts.org.ai/w4-236-buying-decision","stableHash":"wcc:w4:236:buying-decision:v1"},"problem":{"slotStatement":"On bid day, estimators manually normalize 15–40 subcontractor proposals per trade into apples-to-apples comparisons — reconciling inclusions, exclusions, alternates, and scope gaps across incompatible PDFs — and the resulting bid tabs are opaque, ungrounded in the source proposals, and impossible for the Chief Estimator to defend in a post-award audit or scope-gap dispute."},"approach":{"oneSentence":"An AI service that ingests subcontractor proposals and the project's scope-of-work documents, produces a bid-leveling tab where every normalized line item cites the exact page and clause in the originating proposal, and outputs a review-ready vendor-selection memo scored against the GC's own selection rubric so the Chief Estimator can trace every award decision back to primary-source evidence."},"customer":{"icpShape":"US regional general contractors ($50M–$500M annual revenue, 100–800 employees) bidding on commercial and institutional building projects, where the buyer is the VP of Preconstruction or Chief Estimator who signs the tooling PO and the daily user is the Senior Estimator or Procurement Lead running subcontractor bid leveling.","beachheadShape":"EarlyAdopterJTBD: regional GCs running 8–20 concurrent hard-bid pursuits whose estimating teams currently bid-level subcontractor proposals in Excel the night before bid day"},"archetype":"startup-archetypes.org.ai/AIService-MoneyOnDelivery","beachhead":"EarlyAdopterJTBD: regional GCs running 8–20 concurrent hard-bid pursuits whose estimating teams currently bid-level subcontractor proposals in Excel the night before bid day","competitors":{"substitutes":[{"name":"Excel bid tab templates shared across the estimating team","category":"status-quo"},{"name":"Building Connected (Autodesk) bid management","category":"incumbent"},{"name":"SmartBid / Procore bid board","category":"incumbent"},{"name":"ChatGPT / Claude used ad-hoc by estimators to summarize PDF proposals","category":"AI-native horizontal"},{"name":"Offshore preconstruction support firms doing manual bid leveling","category":"human alternative"}]},"studioThesis":"T-AIS-LOW-TECH","killThreshold":{"K":8,"M":30,"N":7,"rubricItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C7_magicLensFit","C8_lensFit","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicy":"all-load-bearing-pass-and-overall-ge-X","loadBearingItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence"],"verdictPolicyVerbatim":"KILL unless every load-bearing rubric item passes per workbook AND overall pass-rate ≥ 7/9 (CASCADE.md §4 Stage 9 commit threshold)."},"lifecycleState":"Active","differentiation":{"twoByTwo":{"xAxis":"Citation depth to primary-source proposal clauses (no citation ↔ every line item linked to page+clause in the originating subcontractor PDF)","yAxis":"Native fit to the GC's bid-day workflow (generic document tool ↔ pre-wired to CSI divisions, scope-gap logic, and the GC's own vendor-selection rubric)","winningQuadrant":"High citation depth + high bid-day workflow fit: every leveled line traces to a specific clause in a specific sub's proposal, delivered inside a CSI-structured bid tab and a rubric-scored selection memo the Chief Estimator can defend in audit","loservilleEscape":true,"loservilleQuadrant":"Low citation depth + low workflow fit: ChatGPT/Claude summarizing proposal PDFs into ungrounded prose with no clause-level links and no awareness of CSI divisions, scope gaps, or the GC's selection criteria — producing output that cannot be dropped into a bid tab or defended post-award"}},"unmetRequirements":[],"pricingArchitecture":"usage-meter"},"actions":{},"options":{},"relationships":{"runtimeUnit":"https://api.sb/v1/runtime-units?startupRef=startup%3Afh%3Aw4-236-buying-decision%3Av1","brand":"https://api.sb/v1/brands?startupId=startup%3Afh%3Aw4-236-buying-decision%3Av1","listing":"https://api.services/listings?foundingHypothesisRef=fh%3Aw4-236-buying-decision%3Av1","cell":"https://api.sb/v1/cells/work-contexts.org.ai/w4-236-buying-decision","thesis":"https://api.sb/v1/theses/T-AIS-LOW-TECH"},"meta":{"level":"L0","scopes":[]},"user":{"requestId":"a0575a0889b2a594","edgeLocation":"a0575a0889b2a594","geo":{"country":"US"},"ua":{"browser":"Claude"}},"references":{"total":0,"limit":25,"page":1,"links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-236-buying-decision%3Av1/references"},"items":[]}}