{"api":{"name":"api.sb","description":"Business-as-Code surface for Startups.Studio","home":"https://api.sb","docs":"https://api.sb/docs","version":"1.0.0"},"$context":"https://api.sb/$context","$type":"FoundingHypothesis","$id":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-332-buying-decision%3Av1","links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-332-buying-decision%3Av1","canonical":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-332-buying-decision%3Av1","pool":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses"},"foundingHypothesis":{"id":"fh:w4-332-buying-decision:v1","lens":"AIService","type":"founding-hypothesis","click":{"rubricScores":{"C8_lensFit":1,"C7_magicLensFit":1,"C4_competitorHonesty":1,"C6_crossSlotCoherence":1,"C1_customerSpecificity":1,"C2_problemFrictionRealism":1,"C9_killCriteriaAttestability":1,"C3_approachEngineCoverability":1,"C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape":1},"upperRightLoserville":true},"cellRef":{"id":"work-contexts.org.ai/w4-332-buying-decision","stableHash":"wcc:w4:332:buying-decision:v1"},"problem":{"slotStatement":"Sourcing managers at fab shops compare 4–8 vendor quotes on heterogeneous line items (material certs, tolerancing, lead-time, NDT, finishing) inside Excel and email threads, then owe Operations a defensible recommendation memo — today that memo is a gut-feel narrative that Finance and Quality challenge in the approval meeting, causing 2–6 week PO delays and re-bids when the rationale cannot be traced back to the quote pack."},"approach":{"oneSentence":"An AI sourcing analyst that ingests the RFQ pack, vendor quotes, prior-job QA history, and spec drawings for fabricated-metal buys and produces a review-ready vendor scorecard where every score cites the exact quote line, spec clause, or past-performance record it came from, so the PO approval meeting runs off a traceable record instead of a narrative."},"customer":{"icpShape":"North American contract fabricated-metal manufacturers ($30M–$250M revenue, 150–800 employees, job-shop or mixed-mode sheet metal / weldments / machined assemblies) where the buyer is the VP of Operations or COO and the daily user is the Sourcing Manager or Senior Buyer running vendor selection for capex machinery, tooling, and outsourced fabrication packages","beachheadShape":"EarlyAdopterJTBD: sourcing teams at Tier-2 fabricators running 3+ competitive RFQs per quarter for capex >$100K or recurring outsourced fab where a bad vendor pick causes line-down risk"},"archetype":"startup-archetypes.org.ai/AIService-MoneyOnDelivery","beachhead":"EarlyAdopterJTBD: sourcing teams at Tier-2 fabricators running 3+ competitive RFQs per quarter for capex >$100K or recurring outsourced fab where a bad vendor pick causes line-down risk","competitors":{"substitutes":[{"name":"Excel RFQ comparison templates + Outlook threads","category":"status-quo"},{"name":"Coupa / Ivalu / SAP Ariba sourcing modules","category":"incumbent"},{"name":"ChatGPT / Copilot summarizing pasted quote PDFs","category":"AI-native horizontal"},{"name":"Third-party sourcing consultants (e.g., Dragon Sourcing, boutique fab-sourcing firms)","category":"human alternative"}]},"studioThesis":"T-BU","killThreshold":{"K":8,"M":30,"N":7,"rubricItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C7_magicLensFit","C8_lensFit","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicy":"all-load-bearing-pass-and-overall-ge-X","loadBearingItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence"],"verdictPolicyVerbatim":"KILL unless every load-bearing rubric item passes per workbook AND overall pass-rate ≥ 7/9 (CASCADE.md §4 Stage 9 commit threshold)."},"lifecycleState":"Active","differentiation":{"twoByTwo":{"xAxis":"Depth of fabricated-metal domain model (spec clauses, GD&T, material certs, NDT, finishing codes parsed as structured fields)","yAxis":"Line-level citation back to source artifact (each scorecard cell links to the quote line, drawing callout, or past-NCR it was derived from)","winningQuadrant":"High domain depth + line-level citation: every vendor score in the approval memo is defensible down to the quote line and spec clause, which requires both a fab-specific schema and an ingestion pipeline over heterogeneous vendor quote formats that horizontal tools have not built","loservilleEscape":true,"loservilleQuadrant":"Low domain depth + no citation: ChatGPT-style summarization of pasted quote PDFs produces a fluent recommendation paragraph with no structured fields and no links back to the source quote lines, so Quality and Finance reject it in the approval meeting — this is the documented failure mode of the ChatGPT/Copilot substitute today"}},"unmetRequirements":[],"pricingArchitecture":"usage-meter"},"actions":{},"options":{},"relationships":{"runtimeUnit":"https://api.sb/v1/runtime-units?startupRef=startup%3Afh%3Aw4-332-buying-decision%3Av1","brand":"https://api.sb/v1/brands?startupId=startup%3Afh%3Aw4-332-buying-decision%3Av1","listing":"https://api.services/listings?foundingHypothesisRef=fh%3Aw4-332-buying-decision%3Av1","cell":"https://api.sb/v1/cells/work-contexts.org.ai/w4-332-buying-decision","thesis":"https://api.sb/v1/theses/T-BU"},"meta":{"level":"L0","scopes":[]},"user":{"requestId":"a05759e5addba594","edgeLocation":"a05759e5addba594","geo":{"country":"US"},"ua":{"browser":"Claude"}},"references":{"total":0,"limit":25,"page":1,"links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-332-buying-decision%3Av1/references"},"items":[]}}