{"api":{"name":"api.sb","description":"Business-as-Code surface for Startups.Studio","home":"https://api.sb","docs":"https://api.sb/docs","version":"1.0.0"},"$context":"https://api.sb/$context","$type":"FoundingHypothesis","$id":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-522-customer-onboarding%3Av1","links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-522-customer-onboarding%3Av1","canonical":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-522-customer-onboarding%3Av1","pool":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses"},"foundingHypothesis":{"id":"fh:w4-522-customer-onboarding:v1","lens":"AIService","type":"founding-hypothesis","click":{"rubricScores":{"C8_lensFit":1,"C7_magicLensFit":1,"C4_competitorHonesty":1,"C6_crossSlotCoherence":1,"C1_customerSpecificity":1,"C2_problemFrictionRealism":1,"C9_killCriteriaAttestability":1,"C3_approachEngineCoverability":1,"C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape":1},"upperRightLoserville":true},"cellRef":{"id":"work-contexts.org.ai/w4-522-customer-onboarding","stableHash":"wcc:w4:522:customer-onboarding:v1"},"problem":{"slotStatement":"Onboarding analysts re-key customer identity evidence across CIP checklists, CDD forms, sanctions screening hits, and beneficial-ownership certifications, then a QC reviewer manually reconstructs each file's decision trail for audit — so files sit in exception queues for 5–12 days and examiners still flag missing justifications."},"approach":{"oneSentence":"An AI onboarding coordinator that ingests the applicant packet, runs each CIP/CDD/BSA checkpoint against a bank-configured rubric, and emits a review-ready case file where every decision cites the underlying document, screening hit, or policy clause an examiner can open."},"customer":{"icpShape":"US regional banks and credit unions with $2B–$25B in assets running KYC/CIP customer onboarding, where the buyer is the Chief Compliance Officer (or BSA Officer) and the daily user is the onboarding analyst or new-accounts operations lead","beachheadShape":"EarlyAdopterJTBD: regional banks with rising CIP exception backlogs and recent MRA/MRIA findings on onboarding file quality"},"archetype":"startup-archetypes.org.ai/AIService-MoneyOnDelivery","beachhead":"EarlyAdopterJTBD: regional banks with rising CIP exception backlogs and recent MRA/MRIA findings on onboarding file quality","competitors":{"substitutes":[{"name":"Alloy / Fenergo onboarding orchestration","category":"incumbent"},{"name":"In-house QC analyst team working from Excel checklists and Word memos","category":"status-quo"},{"name":"ChatGPT Enterprise / Copilot used ad-hoc by compliance staff","category":"AI-native horizontal"},{"name":"Big-4 / Protiviti onboarding remediation engagements","category":"human alternative"}]},"studioThesis":"T-LOW","killThreshold":{"K":8,"M":30,"N":7,"rubricItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C7_magicLensFit","C8_lensFit","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicy":"all-load-bearing-pass-and-overall-ge-X","loadBearingItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence"],"verdictPolicyVerbatim":"KILL unless every load-bearing rubric item passes per workbook AND overall pass-rate ≥ 7/9 (CASCADE.md §4 Stage 9 commit threshold)."},"lifecycleState":"Active","differentiation":{"twoByTwo":{"xAxis":"Depth of per-decision evidence linking back to the source document, screening record, and written CIP/CDD policy clause","yAxis":"Native fit to the bank's existing core/LOS onboarding workflow (Jack Henry, Fiserv, nCino) without forcing a rip-and-replace orchestration layer","winningQuadrant":"High evidence depth + High workflow fit: a case file where every CIP/CDD conclusion is clickable back to primary evidence AND drops into the bank's existing nCino/Fiserv queues as a reviewable exception, defensible to an OCC/FDIC examiner on day one","loservilleEscape":true,"loservilleQuadrant":"Low evidence depth + Low workflow fit: ChatGPT Enterprise used ad-hoc by an analyst — produces plausible onboarding summaries with no document citations, lives outside the LOS, and leaves the QC reviewer rebuilding the audit trail by hand"}},"unmetRequirements":[],"pricingArchitecture":"usage-meter"},"actions":{},"options":{},"relationships":{"runtimeUnit":"https://api.sb/v1/runtime-units?startupRef=startup%3Afh%3Aw4-522-customer-onboarding%3Av1","brand":"https://api.sb/v1/brands?startupId=startup%3Afh%3Aw4-522-customer-onboarding%3Av1","listing":"https://api.services/listings?foundingHypothesisRef=fh%3Aw4-522-customer-onboarding%3Av1","cell":"https://api.sb/v1/cells/work-contexts.org.ai/w4-522-customer-onboarding","thesis":"https://api.sb/v1/theses/T-LOW"},"meta":{"level":"L0","scopes":[]},"user":{"requestId":"a05759594c98994c","edgeLocation":"a05759594c98994c","geo":{"country":"US"},"ua":{"browser":"Claude"}},"references":{"total":0,"limit":25,"page":1,"links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-522-customer-onboarding%3Av1/references"},"items":[]}}