{"api":{"name":"api.sb","description":"Business-as-Code surface for Startups.Studio","home":"https://api.sb","docs":"https://api.sb/docs","version":"1.0.0"},"$context":"https://api.sb/$context","$type":"FoundingHypothesis","$id":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-5411-inventory-audit%3Av1","links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-5411-inventory-audit%3Av1","canonical":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-5411-inventory-audit%3Av1","pool":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses"},"foundingHypothesis":{"id":"fh:w4-5411-inventory-audit:v1","lens":"AIService","type":"founding-hypothesis","click":{"rubricScores":{"C8_lensFit":1,"C7_magicLensFit":1,"C4_competitorHonesty":1,"C6_crossSlotCoherence":1,"C1_customerSpecificity":1,"C2_problemFrictionRealism":1,"C9_killCriteriaAttestability":1,"C3_approachEngineCoverability":1,"C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape":1},"upperRightLoserville":true},"cellRef":{"id":"work-contexts.org.ai/w4-5411-inventory-audit","stableHash":"wcc:w4:5411:inventory-audit:v1"},"problem":{"slotStatement":"Litigation-support teams manually reconcile evidence-room logs, Relativity workspaces, and custodial media inventories against matter files on a quarterly cycle — a 3-6 week process where missing items surface only during audit, chain-of-custody gaps are caught late, and reviewers cannot produce a traceable record showing which SKUs were counted, by whom, and against which source-of-truth."},"approach":{"oneSentence":"An AI audit service that ingests evidence-room logs, DMS exports, and e-discovery workspace manifests, performs a reconciled cycle count against matter-level inventory of record, and emits a review-ready audit packet with every item-level discrepancy linked back to its primary-source line so counsel can sign off without re-doing the count."},"customer":{"icpShape":"US law firms of 150–600 attorneys with multi-office litigation practices, where the buyer is the Director of Litigation Support (or COO for firms without one) who signs the PO and the daily user is the Litigation Support Manager running inventory audits and cycle counts across evidence, exhibits, and custodial media holdings","beachheadShape":"EarlyAdopterJTBD: AmLaw 200 litigation-support teams preparing for annual chain-of-custody audits and matter-closeout cycle counts across physical evidence rooms and e-discovery repositories"},"archetype":"startup-archetypes.org.ai/AIService-MoneyOnDelivery","beachhead":"EarlyAdopterJTBD: AmLaw 200 litigation-support teams preparing for annual chain-of-custody audits and matter-closeout cycle counts across physical evidence rooms and e-discovery repositories","competitors":{"substitutes":[{"name":"In-house paralegal teams running Excel reconciliations against Relativity and iManage exports","category":"status-quo"},{"name":"Consilio / Epiq managed-review inventory audit engagements","category":"human alternative"},{"name":"Relativity Analytics + built-in audit dashboards","category":"incumbent"},{"name":"Horizontal LLM tools (ChatGPT Enterprise, Harvey) prompted ad-hoc for reconciliation","category":"AI-native horizontal"}]},"studioThesis":"T-BU","killThreshold":{"K":8,"M":30,"N":7,"rubricItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C7_magicLensFit","C8_lensFit","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicy":"all-load-bearing-pass-and-overall-ge-X","loadBearingItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence"],"verdictPolicyVerbatim":"KILL unless every load-bearing rubric item passes per workbook AND overall pass-rate ≥ 7/9 (CASCADE.md §4 Stage 9 commit threshold)."},"lifecycleState":"Active","differentiation":{"twoByTwo":{"xAxis":"Primary-source linkage depth (every counted item traced to evidence-log line + DMS doc ID + Relativity artifact, vs. aggregated counts without line-level provenance)","yAxis":"Workflow coverage across the full cycle-count process (intake → reconciliation → discrepancy triage → audit packet, vs. point-tool covering only one step)","winningQuadrant":"Deep primary-source linkage + full cycle-count workflow coverage: produces a review-ready audit packet where every reconciled SKU is clickable back to its evidence-log row and DMS record, covering the entire audit from manifest ingest to signed attestation","loservilleEscape":true,"loservilleQuadrant":"Shallow linkage + single-step coverage: horizontal LLM tools (ChatGPT Enterprise, Harvey) prompted ad-hoc produce reconciliation summaries with no item-level traceback to evidence logs and cover only the narrative-drafting step, forcing paralegals to rebuild provenance by hand before the audit is defensible"}},"unmetRequirements":[],"pricingArchitecture":"usage-meter"},"actions":{},"options":{},"relationships":{"runtimeUnit":"https://api.sb/v1/runtime-units?startupRef=startup%3Afh%3Aw4-5411-inventory-audit%3Av1","brand":"https://api.sb/v1/brands?startupId=startup%3Afh%3Aw4-5411-inventory-audit%3Av1","listing":"https://api.services/listings?foundingHypothesisRef=fh%3Aw4-5411-inventory-audit%3Av1","cell":"https://api.sb/v1/cells/work-contexts.org.ai/w4-5411-inventory-audit","thesis":"https://api.sb/v1/theses/T-BU"},"meta":{"level":"L0","scopes":[]},"user":{"requestId":"a0575a25bde0a594","edgeLocation":"a0575a25bde0a594","geo":{"country":"US"},"ua":{"browser":"Claude"}},"references":{"total":0,"limit":25,"page":1,"links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-5411-inventory-audit%3Av1/references"},"items":[]}}