{"api":{"name":"api.sb","description":"Business-as-Code surface for Startups.Studio","home":"https://api.sb","docs":"https://api.sb/docs","version":"1.0.0"},"$context":"https://api.sb/$context","$type":"FoundingHypothesis","$id":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-5415-buying-decision%3Av1","links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-5415-buying-decision%3Av1","canonical":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-5415-buying-decision%3Av1","pool":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses"},"foundingHypothesis":{"id":"fh:w4-5415-buying-decision:v1","lens":"AIService","type":"founding-hypothesis","click":{"rubricScores":{"C8_lensFit":1,"C7_magicLensFit":1,"C4_competitorHonesty":1,"C6_crossSlotCoherence":1,"C1_customerSpecificity":1,"C2_problemFrictionRealism":1,"C9_killCriteriaAttestability":1,"C3_approachEngineCoverability":1,"C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape":1},"upperRightLoserville":true},"cellRef":{"id":"work-contexts.org.ai/w4-5415-buying-decision","stableHash":"wcc:w4:5415:buying-decision:v1"},"problem":{"slotStatement":"Architects drown in vendor decks, SOC2 packets, and reference-call notes while trying to produce a defensible vendor-selection memo; scoring spreadsheets drift between analysts, primary-source claims go unlinked, and the final recommendation cannot be audited back to the actual vendor artifact that supported each claim."},"approach":{"oneSentence":"An AI service that ingests vendor RFP responses, datasheets, and security questionnaires, scores each vendor against the buyer's weighted selection rubric, and produces a review-ready selection memo where every scoring claim links back to the exact line in the source vendor document."},"customer":{"icpShape":"Mid-market computer systems design / IT services firms ($50M–$500M revenue) evaluating multi-vendor infrastructure purchases, where the buyer is the VP of Infrastructure or CIO who signs the PO and the daily user is the Senior Solutions Architect or Procurement Lead running the RFP","beachheadShape":"EarlyMajorityWorkflow: systems integrators running 3+ concurrent vendor selections per quarter for hybrid-cloud or networking stack refreshes"},"archetype":"startup-archetypes.org.ai/AIService-MoneyOnDelivery","beachhead":"EarlyMajorityWorkflow: systems integrators running 3+ concurrent vendor selections per quarter for hybrid-cloud or networking stack refreshes","competitors":{"substitutes":[{"name":"Gartner Peer Insights + analyst inquiry calls","category":"incumbent"},{"name":"RFPIO / Responsive (buyer-side RFP scoring spreadsheets)","category":"status-quo"},{"name":"ChatGPT Enterprise with vendor PDFs uploaded ad-hoc","category":"AI-native horizontal"},{"name":"Big-4 advisory engagement for vendor selection","category":"human alternative"}]},"studioThesis":"T-LOW","killThreshold":{"K":8,"M":30,"N":7,"rubricItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C7_magicLensFit","C8_lensFit","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicy":"all-load-bearing-pass-and-overall-ge-X","loadBearingItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence"],"verdictPolicyVerbatim":"KILL unless every load-bearing rubric item passes per workbook AND overall pass-rate ≥ 7/9 (CASCADE.md §4 Stage 9 commit threshold)."},"lifecycleState":"Active","differentiation":{"twoByTwo":{"xAxis":"Claim-to-source traceability (every score links to the vendor artifact line that justifies it)","yAxis":"Workflow fit to the vendor-selection memo lifecycle (rubric weighting, stakeholder sign-off, procurement handoff)","winningQuadrant":"High traceability + high workflow fit: every rubric cell cites the exact SOC2 clause, datasheet spec, or RFP answer, inside a memo structure procurement and the CIO already sign against","loservilleEscape":true,"loservilleQuadrant":"Low traceability + low workflow fit: ChatGPT Enterprise summarizing uploaded vendor PDFs into prose recommendations with no rubric, no citations back to clause-level source, and no procurement-ready memo format — exactly how ad-hoc LLM use fails audit review today"}},"unmetRequirements":[],"pricingArchitecture":"usage-meter"},"actions":{},"options":{},"relationships":{"runtimeUnit":"https://api.sb/v1/runtime-units?startupRef=startup%3Afh%3Aw4-5415-buying-decision%3Av1","brand":"https://api.sb/v1/brands?startupId=startup%3Afh%3Aw4-5415-buying-decision%3Av1","listing":"https://api.services/listings?foundingHypothesisRef=fh%3Aw4-5415-buying-decision%3Av1","cell":"https://api.sb/v1/cells/work-contexts.org.ai/w4-5415-buying-decision","thesis":"https://api.sb/v1/theses/T-LOW"},"meta":{"level":"L0","scopes":[]},"user":{"requestId":"a0575aaa3a090555","edgeLocation":"a0575aaa3a090555","geo":{"country":"US"},"ua":{"browser":"Claude"}},"references":{"total":0,"limit":25,"page":1,"links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-5415-buying-decision%3Av1/references"},"items":[]}}