{"api":{"name":"api.sb","description":"Business-as-Code surface for Startups.Studio","home":"https://api.sb","docs":"https://api.sb/docs","version":"1.0.0"},"$context":"https://api.sb/$context","$type":"FoundingHypothesis","$id":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-5417-buying-decision%3Av1","links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-5417-buying-decision%3Av1","canonical":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-5417-buying-decision%3Av1","pool":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses"},"foundingHypothesis":{"id":"fh:w4-5417-buying-decision:v1","lens":"AIService","type":"founding-hypothesis","click":{"rubricScores":{"C8_lensFit":1,"C7_magicLensFit":1,"C4_competitorHonesty":1,"C6_crossSlotCoherence":1,"C1_customerSpecificity":1,"C2_problemFrictionRealism":1,"C9_killCriteriaAttestability":1,"C3_approachEngineCoverability":1,"C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape":1},"upperRightLoserville":true},"cellRef":{"id":"work-contexts.org.ai/w4-5417-buying-decision","stableHash":"wcc:w4:5417:buying-decision:v1"},"problem":{"slotStatement":"Scientific buying committees burn 8–16 weeks assembling vendor bake-off evidence across scattered spec sheets, demo notes, application-scientist emails, and pilot data, then cannot produce a review-ready justification that survives procurement, QA, and scientific-advisory scrutiny when a challenged vendor pushes back."},"approach":{"oneSentence":"An AI evaluation service that ingests vendor RFP responses, demo recordings, pilot datasets, and published benchmarks, scores each vendor against a scientist-authored weighted rubric, and emits a traceable record where every criterion score links back to the primary-source evidence a reviewer can click through."},"customer":{"icpShape":"Mid-size contract research organizations and biotech R&D groups (150–1,500 FTE) evaluating new lab instruments, reagents, or software platforms, where the buyer is the VP of R&D Operations (or Director of Scientific Procurement) who signs the PO and the daily user is the Staff Scientist or Lab Manager running the bake-off","beachheadShape":"EarlyAdopterJTBD: CRO and biotech R&D-ops teams running formal capital-equipment and platform bake-offs (>$100k ACV) under audit-ready procurement policies"},"archetype":"startup-archetypes.org.ai/AIService-MoneyOnDelivery","beachhead":"EarlyAdopterJTBD: CRO and biotech R&D-ops teams running formal capital-equipment and platform bake-offs (>$100k ACV) under audit-ready procurement policies","competitors":{"substitutes":[{"name":"Excel/SharePoint vendor-scorecard templates maintained by the lab manager","category":"status-quo"},{"name":"Gartner/GlobalData-style analyst reports and peer-review calls","category":"incumbent"},{"name":"ChatGPT Enterprise / Claude used ad hoc to summarize vendor PDFs","category":"AI-native horizontal"},{"name":"Sourcing consultants (e.g., GEP, Efficio) running the bake-off as a paid engagement","category":"human alternative"}]},"studioThesis":"T-BU","killThreshold":{"K":8,"M":30,"N":7,"rubricItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C7_magicLensFit","C8_lensFit","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicy":"all-load-bearing-pass-and-overall-ge-X","loadBearingItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence"],"verdictPolicyVerbatim":"KILL unless every load-bearing rubric item passes per workbook AND overall pass-rate ≥ 7/9 (CASCADE.md §4 Stage 9 commit threshold)."},"lifecycleState":"Active","differentiation":{"twoByTwo":{"xAxis":"Evidence traceability (every score linked to a citable primary source vs. unsourced assertion)","yAxis":"Depth of scientific-domain rubric (assay-, instrument-, and regulatory-specific criteria vs. generic vendor-selection checklist)","winningQuadrant":"High traceability + deep scientific rubric: every vendor score is click-through linked to the exact RFP paragraph, pilot data point, or peer-reviewed citation, scored against a rubric co-authored with domain scientists and tuned per assay class — uncopyable without the scientist-curated rubric library and the primary-source ingestion pipeline","loservilleEscape":true,"loservilleQuadrant":"Low traceability + generic checklist: ChatGPT Enterprise summarizing vendor PDFs into a bullet list with no source links and no assay-specific criteria — reviewers cannot audit where any claim came from, and procurement rejects it when the losing vendor appeals"}},"unmetRequirements":[],"pricingArchitecture":"usage-meter"},"actions":{},"options":{},"relationships":{"runtimeUnit":"https://api.sb/v1/runtime-units?startupRef=startup%3Afh%3Aw4-5417-buying-decision%3Av1","brand":"https://api.sb/v1/brands?startupId=startup%3Afh%3Aw4-5417-buying-decision%3Av1","listing":"https://api.services/listings?foundingHypothesisRef=fh%3Aw4-5417-buying-decision%3Av1","cell":"https://api.sb/v1/cells/work-contexts.org.ai/w4-5417-buying-decision","thesis":"https://api.sb/v1/theses/T-BU"},"meta":{"level":"L0","scopes":[]},"user":{"requestId":"a0575aaf5bc90555","edgeLocation":"a0575aaf5bc90555","geo":{"country":"US"},"ua":{"browser":"Claude"}},"references":{"total":0,"limit":25,"page":1,"links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-5417-buying-decision%3Av1/references"},"items":[]}}