{"api":{"name":"api.sb","description":"Business-as-Code surface for Startups.Studio","home":"https://api.sb","docs":"https://api.sb/docs","version":"1.0.0"},"$context":"https://api.sb/$context","$type":"FoundingHypothesis","$id":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-5611-buying-decision%3Av1","links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-5611-buying-decision%3Av1","canonical":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-5611-buying-decision%3Av1","pool":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses"},"foundingHypothesis":{"id":"fh:w4-5611-buying-decision:v1","lens":"AIService","type":"founding-hypothesis","click":{"rubricScores":{"C8_lensFit":1,"C7_magicLensFit":1,"C4_competitorHonesty":1,"C6_crossSlotCoherence":1,"C1_customerSpecificity":1,"C2_problemFrictionRealism":1,"C9_killCriteriaAttestability":1,"C3_approachEngineCoverability":1,"C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape":1},"upperRightLoserville":true},"cellRef":{"id":"work-contexts.org.ai/w4-5611-buying-decision","stableHash":"wcc:w4:5611:buying-decision:v1"},"problem":{"slotStatement":"Operations leaders drown in vendor demos, reference calls, and inconsistent RFP responses, then defend a six- or seven-figure selection to the CFO and board using a scattered shared drive of scorecards, call notes, and pricing PDFs that no one can reconstruct six months later when the vendor underperforms."},"approach":{"oneSentence":"An AI evaluation workspace that ingests each shortlisted vendor's proposal, demo recordings, and reference calls, scores them against the buyer's weighted selection criteria, and produces a review-ready vendor decision memo with every claim linked back to the source artifact it came from."},"customer":{"icpShape":"US-based office administrative services firms (NAICS 5611, 50–500 seats) evaluating and switching back-office SaaS, IT, and managed-services vendors, where the buyer is the VP of Operations or COO who signs the vendor contract and the daily user is the Operations Manager or Procurement Lead running the RFP.","beachheadShape":"EarlyMajorityWorkflow — multi-site admin-services firms running 3+ concurrent vendor evaluations per year"},"archetype":"startup-archetypes.org.ai/AIService-MoneyOnDelivery","beachhead":"EarlyMajorityWorkflow — multi-site admin-services firms running 3+ concurrent vendor evaluations per year","competitors":{"substitutes":[{"name":"Excel/Google Sheets vendor scorecard templates circulated over email","category":"status-quo"},{"name":"Olive (RFP/vendor evaluation platform)","category":"incumbent"},{"name":"ChatGPT Enterprise / Claude used ad-hoc to summarize vendor proposals","category":"AI-native horizontal"},{"name":"Gartner / boutique sourcing advisors running the evaluation for a fixed fee","category":"human alternative"}]},"studioThesis":"T-TD","killThreshold":{"K":8,"M":30,"N":7,"rubricItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C7_magicLensFit","C8_lensFit","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicy":"all-load-bearing-pass-and-overall-ge-X","loadBearingItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence"],"verdictPolicyVerbatim":"KILL unless every load-bearing rubric item passes per workbook AND overall pass-rate ≥ 7/9 (CASCADE.md §4 Stage 9 commit threshold)."},"lifecycleState":"Active","differentiation":{"twoByTwo":{"xAxis":"Evidence traceability — every scorecard cell links to the exact proposal page, demo timestamp, or reference-call quote it was derived from","yAxis":"Workflow depth for multi-stakeholder vendor selection — native support for weighted criteria, stakeholder voting, and CFO/board-facing decision memos","winningQuadrant":"High traceability + deep selection workflow: a defensible decision memo the COO can hand the CFO where every vendor claim is clickable back to its source artifact, and the criteria/weights/stakeholder inputs are versioned across the full evaluation","loservilleEscape":true,"loservilleQuadrant":"Low traceability + shallow workflow: ChatGPT Enterprise pasted vendor-proposal summaries with no source links and no shared weighted scorecard — fluent prose the CFO cannot audit when the chosen vendor misses SLAs"}},"unmetRequirements":[],"pricingArchitecture":"usage-meter"},"actions":{},"options":{},"relationships":{"runtimeUnit":"https://api.sb/v1/runtime-units?startupRef=startup%3Afh%3Aw4-5611-buying-decision%3Av1","brand":"https://api.sb/v1/brands?startupId=startup%3Afh%3Aw4-5611-buying-decision%3Av1","listing":"https://api.services/listings?foundingHypothesisRef=fh%3Aw4-5611-buying-decision%3Av1","cell":"https://api.sb/v1/cells/work-contexts.org.ai/w4-5611-buying-decision","thesis":"https://api.sb/v1/theses/T-TD"},"meta":{"level":"L0","scopes":[]},"user":{"requestId":"a0575aae39eb0555","edgeLocation":"a0575aae39eb0555","geo":{"country":"US"},"ua":{"browser":"Claude"}},"references":{"total":0,"limit":25,"page":1,"links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-5611-buying-decision%3Av1/references"},"items":[]}}