{"api":{"name":"api.sb","description":"Business-as-Code surface for Startups.Studio","home":"https://api.sb","docs":"https://api.sb/docs","version":"1.0.0"},"$context":"https://api.sb/$context","$type":"FoundingHypothesis","$id":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-6211-buying-decision%3Av1","links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-6211-buying-decision%3Av1","canonical":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-6211-buying-decision%3Av1","pool":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses"},"foundingHypothesis":{"id":"fh:w4-6211-buying-decision:v1","lens":"AIService","type":"founding-hypothesis","click":{"rubricScores":{"C8_lensFit":1,"C7_magicLensFit":1,"C4_competitorHonesty":1,"C6_crossSlotCoherence":1,"C1_customerSpecificity":1,"C2_problemFrictionRealism":1,"C9_killCriteriaAttestability":1,"C3_approachEngineCoverability":1,"C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape":1},"upperRightLoserville":true},"cellRef":{"id":"work-contexts.org.ai/w4-6211-buying-decision","stableHash":"wcc:w4:6211:buying-decision:v1"},"problem":{"slotStatement":"The practice administrator has three vendor demos, a stack of SOC2 PDFs, and partner-meeting pressure to pick, but no defensible way to compare vendors on the criteria that actually matter to this practice (EHR integration depth, billing workflow fit, HIPAA posture, total cost over 3 years) — so the decision collapses into whoever demoed last or whichever rep the lead physician liked."},"approach":{"oneSentence":"An AI buying-committee co-pilot that ingests each vendor's RFP response, security docs, and demo notes, then produces a side-by-side, criterion-by-criterion comparison with every claim linked back to its source document — giving the partners a review-ready scorecard with traceable citations they can defend in the partner meeting."},"customer":{"icpShape":"Independent and physician-owned medical group practices in the US (NAICS 6211, 10–75 providers) evaluating a new clinical or administrative software vendor, where the buyer is the Managing Partner or Practice Administrator who signs the contract and the daily user is the Clinical Operations Lead or Office Manager running the evaluation","beachheadShape":"EarlyMajorityWorkflow: multi-site physician-owned primary care and specialty groups mid-way through replacing an EHR-adjacent point solution (scheduling, RCM, or patient intake) with a shortlist of 3–5 vendors"},"archetype":"startup-archetypes.org.ai/AIService-MoneyOnDelivery","beachhead":"EarlyMajorityWorkflow: multi-site physician-owned primary care and specialty groups mid-way through replacing an EHR-adjacent point solution (scheduling, RCM, or patient intake) with a shortlist of 3–5 vendors","competitors":{"substitutes":[{"name":"Shared Google Sheet vendor-comparison matrix filled in by the office manager","category":"status-quo"},{"name":"KLAS Research / Black Book vendor reports","category":"incumbent"},{"name":"ChatGPT / Claude used ad-hoc to summarize vendor PDFs","category":"AI-native horizontal"},{"name":"Healthcare IT consultant retained for vendor selection (e.g., Nordic, Medicus IT)","category":"human alternative"}]},"studioThesis":"T-HSA","killThreshold":{"K":8,"M":30,"N":7,"rubricItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C7_magicLensFit","C8_lensFit","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicy":"all-load-bearing-pass-and-overall-ge-X","loadBearingItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence"],"verdictPolicyVerbatim":"KILL unless every load-bearing rubric item passes per workbook AND overall pass-rate ≥ 7/9 (CASCADE.md §4 Stage 9 commit threshold)."},"lifecycleState":"Active","differentiation":{"twoByTwo":{"xAxis":"Primary-source traceability of every comparison claim (each cell links to the exact page/clause in the vendor's own document)","yAxis":"Fit to the physician-practice buying workflow (EHR-integration criteria, CPT/RCM terminology, partner-vote artifact format)","winningQuadrant":"High traceability + High practice-workflow fit: a citation-linked scorecard in the format partners already use for vote meetings, where every vendor claim is one click from its source PDF","loservilleEscape":true,"loservilleQuadrant":"Low traceability + Low workflow fit: ChatGPT summarizing vendor PDFs into generic bullet points with no citations and no physician-practice criteria — confident prose the administrator cannot defend when a partner asks 'where did that number come from?'"}},"unmetRequirements":[],"pricingArchitecture":"usage-meter"},"actions":{},"options":{},"relationships":{"runtimeUnit":"https://api.sb/v1/runtime-units?startupRef=startup%3Afh%3Aw4-6211-buying-decision%3Av1","brand":"https://api.sb/v1/brands?startupId=startup%3Afh%3Aw4-6211-buying-decision%3Av1","listing":"https://api.services/listings?foundingHypothesisRef=fh%3Aw4-6211-buying-decision%3Av1","cell":"https://api.sb/v1/cells/work-contexts.org.ai/w4-6211-buying-decision","thesis":"https://api.sb/v1/theses/T-HSA"},"meta":{"level":"L0","scopes":[]},"user":{"requestId":"a0575aa91ff80555","edgeLocation":"a0575aa91ff80555","geo":{"country":"US"},"ua":{"browser":"Claude"}},"references":{"total":0,"limit":25,"page":1,"links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-6211-buying-decision%3Av1/references"},"items":[]}}