{"api":{"name":"api.sb","description":"Business-as-Code surface for Startups.Studio","home":"https://api.sb","docs":"https://api.sb/docs","version":"1.0.0"},"$context":"https://api.sb/$context","$type":"FoundingHypothesis","$id":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-622-buying-decision%3Av1","links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-622-buying-decision%3Av1","canonical":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-622-buying-decision%3Av1","pool":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses"},"foundingHypothesis":{"id":"fh:w4-622-buying-decision:v1","lens":"AIService","type":"founding-hypothesis","click":{"rubricScores":{"C8_lensFit":1,"C7_magicLensFit":1,"C4_competitorHonesty":1,"C6_crossSlotCoherence":1,"C1_customerSpecificity":1,"C2_problemFrictionRealism":1,"C9_killCriteriaAttestability":1,"C3_approachEngineCoverability":1,"C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape":1},"upperRightLoserville":true},"cellRef":{"id":"work-contexts.org.ai/w4-622-buying-decision","stableHash":"wcc:w4:622:buying-decision:v1"},"problem":{"slotStatement":"VACs drown in vendor-submitted security questionnaires, clinical evidence packets, and reference calls, then must justify selection to the CFO and compliance with a defensible paper trail that today is assembled by hand in Word and SharePoint over 4–9 months per decision."},"approach":{"oneSentence":"A premium AI service that ingests vendor RFI responses, HIPAA/SOC2 artifacts, and clinical evidence, scores each vendor against the hospital's own weighted selection rubric, and produces a review-ready selection memo with every claim linked back to its primary-source citation for the committee and CFO."},"customer":{"icpShape":"US health systems with 200–800 beds running structured vendor-selection committees for clinical and enterprise software, where the buyer is the VP of Supply Chain / Chief Value Officer and the daily user is the Value Analysis Committee lead or Sourcing Manager","beachheadShape":"EarlyMajorityWorkflow — hospital Value Analysis Committees evaluating AI/clinical software vendors under new governance policies"},"archetype":"startup-archetypes.org.ai/AIService-MoneyOnDelivery","beachhead":"EarlyMajorityWorkflow — hospital Value Analysis Committees evaluating AI/clinical software vendors under new governance policies","competitors":{"substitutes":[{"name":"GHX / Lumere vendor evaluation modules","category":"incumbent"},{"name":"KLAS Research reports + consultant-led RFPs (e.g., Chartis, ECG)","category":"human alternative"},{"name":"ChatGPT Enterprise / Copilot used ad-hoc by sourcing analysts","category":"AI-native horizontal"},{"name":"SharePoint + Excel scoring templates","category":"status-quo"}]},"studioThesis":"T-AIS-PREM","killThreshold":{"K":8,"M":30,"N":7,"rubricItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C7_magicLensFit","C8_lensFit","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicy":"all-load-bearing-pass-and-overall-ge-X","loadBearingItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence"],"verdictPolicyVerbatim":"KILL unless every load-bearing rubric item passes per workbook AND overall pass-rate ≥ 7/9 (CASCADE.md §4 Stage 9 commit threshold)."},"lifecycleState":"Active","differentiation":{"twoByTwo":{"xAxis":"Primary-source citation depth per scored criterion (every rubric score traces to a line in the vendor's SOC2, BAA, or clinical study)","yAxis":"Fit to the hospital's own weighted VAC rubric and governance workflow (not a generic vendor scorecard)","winningQuadrant":"High citation depth + High fit to hospital-specific rubric: every criterion in the committee's own weighting model is scored with a clickable link to the exact vendor artifact, producing a memo the CFO and Compliance can audit line-by-line","loservilleEscape":true,"loservilleQuadrant":"Low citation depth + Low rubric fit: ChatGPT Enterprise summaries of vendor marketing PDFs pasted into a generic SharePoint scoring template — no source links, no alignment to the VAC's weighted criteria, rejected by Compliance on first review"}},"unmetRequirements":[],"pricingArchitecture":"usage-meter"},"actions":{},"options":{},"relationships":{"runtimeUnit":"https://api.sb/v1/runtime-units?startupRef=startup%3Afh%3Aw4-622-buying-decision%3Av1","brand":"https://api.sb/v1/brands?startupId=startup%3Afh%3Aw4-622-buying-decision%3Av1","listing":"https://api.services/listings?foundingHypothesisRef=fh%3Aw4-622-buying-decision%3Av1","cell":"https://api.sb/v1/cells/work-contexts.org.ai/w4-622-buying-decision","thesis":"https://api.sb/v1/theses/T-AIS-PREM"},"meta":{"level":"L0","scopes":[]},"user":{"requestId":"a05759d1abc5a594","edgeLocation":"a05759d1abc5a594","geo":{"country":"US"},"ua":{"browser":"Claude"}},"references":{"total":0,"limit":25,"page":1,"links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-622-buying-decision%3Av1/references"},"items":[]}}