{"api":{"name":"api.sb","description":"Business-as-Code surface for Startups.Studio","home":"https://api.sb","docs":"https://api.sb/docs","version":"1.0.0"},"$context":"https://api.sb/$context","$type":"FoundingHypothesis","$id":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-7225-inventory-audit%3Av1","links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-7225-inventory-audit%3Av1","canonical":"https://api.sb/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-7225-inventory-audit%3Av1","pool":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses"},"foundingHypothesis":{"id":"fh:w4-7225-inventory-audit:v1","lens":"AIService","type":"founding-hypothesis","click":{"rubricScores":{"C8_lensFit":1,"C7_magicLensFit":1,"C4_competitorHonesty":1,"C6_crossSlotCoherence":1,"C1_customerSpecificity":1,"C2_problemFrictionRealism":1,"C9_killCriteriaAttestability":1,"C3_approachEngineCoverability":1,"C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape":1},"upperRightLoserville":true},"cellRef":{"id":"work-contexts.org.ai/w4-7225-inventory-audit","stableHash":"wcc:w4:7225:inventory-audit:v1"},"problem":{"slotStatement":"Weekly cycle counts and period-end inventory audits in multi-unit restaurants rely on clipboard walks, shared spreadsheets, and eyeballed par levels — by the time a GM reconciles theoretical-vs-actual usage against invoices and POS depletion, the variance is two weeks old, the shrink source is unknowable, and the district manager has no defensible record to take to the franchisee or the auditor."},"approach":{"oneSentence":"An AI-assisted cycle-count service that ingests the chain's invoice feed, POS depletion, and store-submitted count sheets, reconciles line-item variance against recipe-level theoretical usage, and returns a review-ready variance packet with every number traceable back to its source invoice, count entry, or POS ticket."},"customer":{"icpShape":"Multi-unit restaurant operators (15–150 locations) in full-service and fast-casual segments, where the buyer is the VP of Operations or Director of Finance and the daily user is the district manager or store-level inventory lead running weekly cycle counts","beachheadShape":"EarlyMajorityWorkflow: regional full-service and fast-casual chains (20–75 units) that already run weekly or period-end cycle counts but book six-figure annual inventory variance write-offs"},"archetype":"startup-archetypes.org.ai/AIService-MoneyOnDelivery","beachhead":"EarlyMajorityWorkflow: regional full-service and fast-casual chains (20–75 units) that already run weekly or period-end cycle counts but book six-figure annual inventory variance write-offs","competitors":{"substitutes":[{"name":"MarginEdge","category":"incumbent"},{"name":"Restaurant365 inventory module","category":"incumbent"},{"name":"Excel cycle-count templates shared via email","category":"status-quo"},{"name":"ChatGPT + an ops analyst pasting in CSVs","category":"AI-native horizontal"},{"name":"Outsourced RGIS-style physical count crews","category":"human alternative"}]},"studioThesis":"T-AIS-LOW-TECH","killThreshold":{"K":8,"M":30,"N":7,"rubricItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence","C7_magicLensFit","C8_lensFit","C9_killCriteriaAttestability"],"verdictPolicy":"all-load-bearing-pass-and-overall-ge-X","loadBearingItemSet":["C1_customerSpecificity","C2_problemFrictionRealism","C3_approachEngineCoverability","C4_competitorHonesty","C5_differentiationLoservilleEscape","C6_crossSlotCoherence"],"verdictPolicyVerbatim":"KILL unless every load-bearing rubric item passes per workbook AND overall pass-rate ≥ 7/9 (CASCADE.md §4 Stage 9 commit threshold)."},"lifecycleState":"Active","differentiation":{"twoByTwo":{"xAxis":"Line-item traceability of each variance number back to a specific invoice/POS/count-sheet source","yAxis":"Depth of multi-unit restaurant workflow fit (recipe cards, par levels, waste logs, vendor catalog normalization)","winningQuadrant":"High traceability + deep restaurant workflow fit: every variance line in the weekly packet links to its source document and is computed against the chain's actual recipe-level theoretical usage, so a district manager can defend the number to a franchisee or auditor without rebuilding the math","loservilleEscape":true,"loservilleQuadrant":"Low traceability + shallow workflow fit: ChatGPT-on-pasted-CSVs and emailed Excel templates produce a variance number with no audit trail and no recipe-level theoretical, so the GM cannot answer 'which invoice drove this' and the district manager cannot sign off — MarginEdge and R365 sit mid-axis on workflow but still surface aggregate variance without per-line source linkage, leaving the traceability gap the named substitutes currently exhibit"}},"unmetRequirements":[],"pricingArchitecture":"usage-meter"},"actions":{},"options":{},"relationships":{"runtimeUnit":"https://api.sb/v1/runtime-units?startupRef=startup%3Afh%3Aw4-7225-inventory-audit%3Av1","brand":"https://api.sb/v1/brands?startupId=startup%3Afh%3Aw4-7225-inventory-audit%3Av1","listing":"https://api.services/listings?foundingHypothesisRef=fh%3Aw4-7225-inventory-audit%3Av1","cell":"https://api.sb/v1/cells/work-contexts.org.ai/w4-7225-inventory-audit","thesis":"https://api.sb/v1/theses/T-AIS-LOW-TECH"},"meta":{"level":"L0","scopes":[]},"user":{"requestId":"a057593fad1b994c","edgeLocation":"a057593fad1b994c","geo":{"country":"US"},"ua":{"browser":"Claude"}},"references":{"total":0,"limit":25,"page":1,"links":{"self":"https://api.sb/v1/founding-hypotheses/fh%3Aw4-7225-inventory-audit%3Av1/references"},"items":[]}}